136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27363570)
21. Methodological standards for the development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules: a review of the literature.
Cowley LE; Farewell DM; Maguire S; Kemp AM
Diagn Progn Res; 2019; 3():16. PubMed ID: 31463368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prescriptive clinical prediction rules in back pain research: a systematic review.
May S; Rosedale R
J Man Manip Ther; 2009; 17(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 20046564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Australian physiotherapists' priorities for the development of clinical prediction rules for low back pain: a qualitative study.
Haskins R; Osmotherly PG; Southgate E; Rivett DA
Physiotherapy; 2015 Mar; 101(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 25037535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Systematic review with meta-analyses and critical appraisal of clinical prediction rules for pulmonary tuberculosis in hospitals.
Gonçalves Bd; Lambert Passos SR; Borges Dos Santos MA; de Andrade CA; Moreira Martins Mde F; de Queiroz Mello FC
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 25633004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding clinical prediction rules for low back pain.
Haskins R; Osmotherly PG; Southgate E; Rivett DA
Man Ther; 2014 Apr; 19(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 24176916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Physiotherapy clinical educators' perceptions and experiences of clinical prediction rules.
Knox GM; Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA
Physiotherapy; 2015 Dec; 101(4):364-72. PubMed ID: 26004583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Generalizability: Linking Evidence to Practice.
Kamper SJ
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2020 Jan; 50(1):45-46. PubMed ID: 31892291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Introducing
Hughes C; Keeton RB; Porter K
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2020 Feb; 50(2):50-51. PubMed ID: 32005091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical prediction rules: new opportunities for pharma.
Herscu P; Hoover TA; Randolph AG
Drug Discov Today; 2009 Dec; 14(23-24):1143-9. PubMed ID: 19853059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictors for independent external validation of cardiovascular risk clinical prediction rules: Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.
Ban JW; Stevens R; Perera R
Diagn Progn Res; 2018; 2():3. PubMed ID: 31093553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical prediction rules for physical therapy interventions: a systematic review.
Beneciuk JM; Bishop MD; George SZ
Phys Ther; 2009 Feb; 89(2):114-24. PubMed ID: 19095806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. External validation of a clinical prediction rule to predict full recovery and ongoing moderate/severe disability following acute whiplash injury.
Ritchie C; Hendrikz J; Jull G; Elliott J; Sterling M
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Apr; 45(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 25827122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Design Characteristics Influence Performance of Clinical Prediction Rules in Validation: A Meta-Epidemiological Study.
Ban JW; Emparanza JI; Urreta I; Burls A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0145779. PubMed ID: 26730980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Design, methods, and reporting of impact studies of cardiovascular clinical prediction rules are suboptimal: a systematic review.
Ban JW; Chan MS; Muthee TB; Paez A; Stevens R; Perera R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():111-120. PubMed ID: 33515655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three New Digital Features From JOSPT in 2020.
Ardern CL; Cooman C; Chapman D; Blazey P; Jermann R
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2020 Sep; 50(9):471-472. PubMed ID: 32867580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Multistep Maturity Model for the Implementation of Electronic and Computable Diagnostic Clinical Prediction Rules (eCPRs).
Corrigan D; McDonnell R; Zarabzadeh A; Fahey T
EGEMS (Wash DC); 2015; 3(2):1153. PubMed ID: 26290890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: a review.
Toll DB; Janssen KJ; Vergouwe Y; Moons KG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1085-94. PubMed ID: 19208371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A systematic review of studies comparing diagnostic clinical prediction rules with clinical judgment.
Sanders S; Doust J; Glasziou P
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128233. PubMed ID: 26039538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reporting Guidelines and Checklists Improve the Reliability and Rigor of Research Reports.
Abbott JH
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Mar; 46(3):130. PubMed ID: 26928734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Increasing the Impact of Peer-Reviewed Publications Through Tailored Dissemination Strategies: Perspectives for Practice Feature in JOSPT.
Sibley K; Li L; Abbott JH
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Jul; 46(7):500-1. PubMed ID: 27363569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
