These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2736451)
1. Comparison of Marlex and Gore-tex to repair abdominal wall defects in the rat. Murphy JL; Freeman JB; Dionne PG Can J Surg; 1989 Jul; 32(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 2736451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model. Menon NG; Rodriguez ED; Byrnes CK; Girotto JA; Goldberg NH; Silverman RP Ann Plast Surg; 2003 May; 50(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 12792544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repair of giant abdominal hernias: does the type of prosthesis matter? Diaz JJ; Gray BW; Dobson JM; Grogan EL; May AK; Miller R; Guy J; O'Neill P; Morris JA Am Surg; 2004 May; 70(5):396-401; discussion 401-2. PubMed ID: 15156946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of novel synthetic materials with traditional methods to repair exposed abdominal wall fascial defects. Aliabadi-Wahle S; Cnota M; Choe E; Jacob JT; Flint LM; Ferrara JJ J Invest Surg; 1998; 11(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 9700617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene patch (Mycro Mesh) and polypropylene prosthesis (Marlex) for repair of abdominal wall defects. Bellón JM; Buján J; Contreras LA; Carrera-San Martín A; Jurado F J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Jul; 183(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 8673302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repair of abdominal wall defects: Gore-Tex vs. Marlex graft. Sher W; Pollack D; Paulides CA; Matsumoto T Am Surg; 1980 Nov; 46(11):618-23. PubMed ID: 6449167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of prosthetic materials used to repair abdominal wall defects. Jenkins SD; Klamer TW; Parteka JJ; Condon RE Surgery; 1983 Aug; 94(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 6224307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevention of adhesion formations following repair of abdominal wall defects with prosthetic materials (an experimental study). Alimoglu O; Akcakaya A; Sahin M; Unlu Y; Ozkan OV; Sanli E; Eryilmaz R Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(51):725-8. PubMed ID: 12828071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Use and evaluation of the usefulness of synthetic materials-- Dallop, Marlex and Gore-tex in alloplasty of ventral hernia]. Otto S; Przetakiewicz Z Wiad Lek; 1990 Sep 1-15; 43(17-18):858-65. PubMed ID: 2148995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of postoperative adhesions to Marlex mesh using experimental adhesion barriers in rats. Naim JO; Pulley D; Scanlan K; Hinshaw JR; Lanzafame RJ J Laparoendosc Surg; 1993 Apr; 3(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 8518475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of adhesion formation, strength of ingrowth, and textile properties of prosthetic meshes after long-term intra-abdominal implantation in a rabbit. Novitsky YW; Harrell AG; Cristiano JA; Paton BL; Norton HJ; Peindl RD; Kercher KW; Heniford BT J Surg Res; 2007 Jun; 140(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 17481980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevention of adhesion formation with use of sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane in a rat model of ventral hernia repair with polypropylene mesh--a randomized, controlled study. Hooker GD; Taylor BM; Driman DK Surgery; 1999 Feb; 125(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 10026756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Abdominal closure using nonabsorbable mesh after massive resuscitation prevents abdominal compartment syndrome and gastrointestinal fistula. Ciresi DL; Cali RF; Senagore AJ Am Surg; 1999 Aug; 65(8):720-4; discussion 724-5. PubMed ID: 10432080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The use of prosthetic materials placed intraperitoneally in the repair of large defects of the abdominal wall, reflections on a limited case series]. Miro AG; Auciello I; Loffredo D; Arenga G; Lombardi D Ann Ital Chir; 1999; 70(2):277-81; discussion 281-2. PubMed ID: 10434463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adhesion formation after incisional hernia repair: a randomized porcine trial. Christoforoni PM; Kim YB; Preys Z; Lay RY; Montz FJ Am Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(11):935-8. PubMed ID: 8895716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of prosthetic materials in incisional hernia repair. Demir U; Mihmanli M; Coskun H; Dilege E; Kalyoncu A; Altinli E; Gunduz B; Yilmaz B Surg Today; 2005; 35(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 15772793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics of prosthetic mesh and autogenous fascia in abdominal wall reconstruction after prolonged implantation. Matloub HS; Jensen P; Grunert BK; Sanger JR; Yousif NJ Ann Plast Surg; 1992 Dec; 29(6):508-11. PubMed ID: 1466546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Elementary evaluation of small intestinal submucosa and polypropylene mesh used for repairing abdominal wall defect in rats]. Zhang X; Luo J; Yang Z Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 19(7):574-7. PubMed ID: 16108349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of adhesion formation and shrinkage of intra-abdominal prosthetics in a rabbit model. Harrell AG; Novitsky YW; Peindl RD; Cobb WS; Austin CE; Cristiano JA; Norton JH; Kercher KW; Heniford BT Am Surg; 2006 Sep; 72(9):808-13; discussion 813-4. PubMed ID: 16986391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]