These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27364781)

  • 21. Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting.
    Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria RJ; Westphalen AC
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Nov; 42(11):2725-2731. PubMed ID: 28451763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiparametric MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Accuracy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; D'Urso D; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M; Russo G; Sabini MG; Valastro LM; Galia A; Fraggetta F
    In Vivo; 2017; 31(3):415-418. PubMed ID: 28438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and validation of a logistic regression model to distinguish transition zone cancers from benign prostatic hyperplasia on multi-parametric prostate MRI.
    Iyama Y; Nakaura T; Katahira K; Iyama A; Nagayama Y; Oda S; Utsunomiya D; Yamashita Y
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3600-3608. PubMed ID: 28289941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
    Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.
    Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A valuable MRI examination method for prostate cancer screening.
    Yang X; Shan L; Cao H; Jiang X; Ma X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Nov; 99(48):e23134. PubMed ID: 33235074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Luminal Water Imaging: Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) and PI-RADS for Characterization of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.
    Hectors SJ; Said D; Gnerre J; Tewari A; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jul; 52(1):271-279. PubMed ID: 31961049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.
    Hermie I; Van Besien J; De Visschere P; Lumen N; Decaestecker K
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():92-98. PubMed ID: 31005183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Cindil E; Oner Y; Sendur HN; Ozdemir H; Gazel E; Tunc L; Cerit MN
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2019 Nov; 70(4):441-451. PubMed ID: 31561925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System V2.0 and V2.1 for Evaluation of Transition Zone Lesions: A 5-Reader 202-Patient Analysis.
    Kim N; Kim S; Prabhu V; Shanbhogue K; Smereka P; Tong A; Anthopolos R; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 46(4):523-529. PubMed ID: 35405714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of MRI for diagnosis of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer.
    Krishna S; Lim CS; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Shabana WM; Lim RS; Schieda N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jan; 47(1):176-185. PubMed ID: 28387981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) lowers apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values among intermediate risk prostate cancers.
    Currin S; Flood TA; Krishna S; Ansari A; McInnes MDF; Schieda N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jul; 50(1):279-287. PubMed ID: 30585372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy.
    Reisæter LA; Fütterer JJ; Halvorsen OJ; Nygård Y; Biermann M; Andersen E; Gravdal K; Haukaas S; Monssen JA; Huisman HJ; Akslen LA; Beisland C; Rørvik J
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 24819231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
    Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
    Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Performance of PI-RADS version 1 versus version 2 regarding the relation with histopathological results.
    Auer T; Edlinger M; Bektic J; Nagele U; Herrmann T; Schäfer G; Aigner F; Junker D
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):687-693. PubMed ID: 27510762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS).
    Meier-Schroers M; Kukuk G; Wolter K; Decker G; Fischer S; Marx C; Traeber F; Sprinkart AM; Block W; Schild HH; Willinek W
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jul; 85(7):1304-11. PubMed ID: 27235878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Effects of dynamic contrast enhancement on diffusion weighted imaging score of 3 in prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 of peripheral zone].
    Wang W; Shao ZH; Huang XH; Xu Y; Feng X; Wang PJ
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 100(13):1002-1006. PubMed ID: 32294857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PI-RADS version 2: evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging interpretation between b = 1000 and b = 1500 s mm
    Kwon MR; Kim CK; Kim JH
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 90(1079):20170438. PubMed ID: 28830221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Assist PI-RADS Version 2 DWI Scoring? A Correlation Study Using the PI-RADSv2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Systems.
    Gaur S; Harmon S; Rosenblum L; Greer MD; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W33-W41. PubMed ID: 29733695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. PI-RADS version 2: quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer.
    Park SY; Shin SJ; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ; Oh YT
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2776-2783. PubMed ID: 27957637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.