These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27365094)

  • 1. Consensus of recommendations guiding comparative effectiveness research methods.
    Morton JB; McConeghy R; Heinrich K; Gatto NM; Caffrey AR
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1354-1360. PubMed ID: 27365094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
    Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: approaches to mitigate bias and confounding in the design of nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part II.
    Cox E; Martin BC; Van Staa T; Garbe E; Siebert U; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1053-61. PubMed ID: 19744292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic bias analysis in pharmacoepidemiology and comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review.
    Hunnicutt JN; Ulbricht CM; Chrysanthopoulou SA; Lapane KL
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 27593968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Fu R; Gartlehner G; Grant M; Shamliyan T; Sedrakyan A; Wilt TJ; Griffith L; Oremus M; Raina P; Ismaila A; Santaguida P; Lau J; Trikalinos TA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1187-97. PubMed ID: 21477993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-study feasibility and identifying sensitivity analyses for protocol pre-specification in comparative effectiveness research.
    Girman CJ; Faries D; Ryan P; Rotelli M; Belger M; Binkowitz B; O'Neill R;
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 24969153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document.
    Witt CM; Aickin M; Cherkin D; Che CT; Elder C; Flower A; Hammerschlag R; Liu JP; Lao L; Phurrough S; Ritenbaugh C; Rubin LH; Schnyer R; Wayne PM; Withers SR; Zhao-Xiang B; Young J; Berman BM;
    Trials; 2014 May; 15():169. PubMed ID: 24885146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness Guidance Document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials.
    Witt CM; Aickin M; Baca T; Cherkin D; Haan MN; Hammerschlag R; Hao JJ; Kaplan GA; Lao L; McKay T; Pierce B; Riley D; Ritenbaugh C; Thorpe K; Tunis S; Weissberg J; Berman BM;
    BMC Complement Altern Med; 2012 Sep; 12():148. PubMed ID: 22953730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology.
    Basch E; Abernethy AP; Mullins CD; Reeve BB; Smith ML; Coons SJ; Sloan J; Wenzel K; Chauhan C; Eppard W; Frank ES; Lipscomb J; Raymond SA; Spencer M; Tunis S
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4249-55. PubMed ID: 23071244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of observational investigations in comparative effectiveness research.
    Marko NF; Weil RJ
    Value Health; 2010 Dec; 13(8):989-97. PubMed ID: 21138497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
    Sox HC
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Norris SL; Atkins D; Bruening W; Fox S; Johnson E; Kane R; Morton SC; Oremus M; Ospina M; Randhawa G; Schoelles K; Shekelle P; Viswanathan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative effectiveness research methods: symposium overview and summary.
    Lohr KN
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S3-6. PubMed ID: 20473188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The refinement of topics for systematic reviews: lessons and recommendations from the Effective Health Care Program.
    Buckley DI; Ansari MT; Butler M; Soh C; Chang CS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 24581296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical research on traditional drugs and food items--the potential of comparative effectiveness research for interdisciplinary research.
    Witt CM
    J Ethnopharmacol; 2013 May; 147(1):254-8. PubMed ID: 23458921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.