203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27365493)
1. Marginal role for 53 common genetic variants in cardiovascular disease prediction.
Morris RW; Cooper JA; Shah T; Wong A; Drenos F; Engmann J; McLachlan S; Jefferis B; Dale C; Hardy R; Kuh D; Ben-Shlomo Y; Wannamethee SG; Whincup PH; Casas JP; Kivimaki M; Kumari M; Talmud PJ; Price JF; Dudbridge F; Hingorani AD; Humphries SE;
Heart; 2016 Oct; 102(20):1640-7. PubMed ID: 27365493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography-derived cardiovascular risk markers, incident cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality in nondiabetics: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
Yeboah J; Carr JJ; Terry JG; Ding J; Zeb I; Liu S; Nasir K; Post W; Blumenthal RS; Budoff MJ
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1233-41. PubMed ID: 23689526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of novel risk markers for improvement in cardiovascular risk assessment in intermediate-risk individuals.
Yeboah J; McClelland RL; Polonsky TS; Burke GL; Sibley CT; O'Leary D; Carr JJ; Goff DC; Greenland P; Herrington DM
JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(8):788-95. PubMed ID: 22910756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary Artery Calcium Volume and Density: Potential Interactions and Overall Predictive Value: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.
Criqui MH; Knox JB; Denenberg JO; Forbang NI; McClelland RL; Novotny TE; Sandfort V; Waalen J; Blaha MJ; Allison MA
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):845-854. PubMed ID: 28797404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiovascular risk prediction: Can Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) be improved by adding simple risk markers? Results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.
Graversen P; Abildstrøm SZ; Jespersen L; Borglykke A; Prescott E
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1546-56. PubMed ID: 26976846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Derivation and validation of QRISK, a new cardiovascular disease risk score for the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study.
Hippisley-Cox J; Coupland C; Vinogradova Y; Robson J; May M; Brindle P
BMJ; 2007 Jul; 335(7611):136. PubMed ID: 17615182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Incremental value of a genetic risk score for the prediction of new vascular events in patients with clinically manifest vascular disease.
Weijmans M; de Bakker PI; van der Graaf Y; Asselbergs FW; Algra A; Jan de Borst G; Spiering W; Visseren FL;
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Apr; 239(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 25687271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of a long-term cardiovascular disease risk prediction equation for low-incidence populations: the CAMUNI-MATISS Cohorts Collaboration study.
Veronesi G; Gianfagna F; Giampaoli S; Chambless LE; Grassi G; Cesana G; Ferrario MM
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1618-25. PubMed ID: 25501263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epigenetic age acceleration is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors and clinical cardiovascular disease risk scores in African Americans.
Ammous F; Zhao W; Ratliff SM; Mosley TH; Bielak LF; Zhou X; Peyser PA; Kardia SLR; Smith JA
Clin Epigenetics; 2021 Mar; 13(1):55. PubMed ID: 33726838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An independent external validation and evaluation of QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction: a prospective open cohort study.
Collins GS; Altman DG
BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2584. PubMed ID: 19584409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of the QRISK cardiovascular risk prediction algorithm in an independent UK sample of patients from general practice: a validation study.
Hippisley-Cox J; Coupland C; Vinogradova Y; Robson J; Brindle P
Heart; 2008 Jan; 94(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 17916661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiovascular disease risk prediction using automated machine learning: A prospective study of 423,604 UK Biobank participants.
Alaa AM; Bolton T; Di Angelantonio E; Rudd JHF; van der Schaar M
PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0213653. PubMed ID: 31091238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polygenic risk scores in cardiovascular risk prediction: A cohort study and modelling analyses.
Sun L; Pennells L; Kaptoge S; Nelson CP; Ritchie SC; Abraham G; Arnold M; Bell S; Bolton T; Burgess S; Dudbridge F; Guo Q; Sofianopoulou E; Stevens D; Thompson JR; Butterworth AS; Wood A; Danesh J; Samani NJ; Inouye M; Di Angelantonio E
PLoS Med; 2021 Jan; 18(1):e1003498. PubMed ID: 33444330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Standardization of the Fried frailty phenotype improves cardiovascular disease risk discrimination.
Boreskie KF; Kehler DS; Costa EC; Hiebert BM; Hamm NC; Moffatt TL; Hay JL; Stammers AN; Kimber DE; Kent DE; Cornish DE; Arora RC; Strachan SM; Semenchuk BN; Duhamel TA
Exp Gerontol; 2019 May; 119():40-44. PubMed ID: 30682391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between a literature-based genetic risk score and cardiovascular events in women.
Paynter NP; Chasman DI; Paré G; Buring JE; Cook NR; Miletich JP; Ridker PM
JAMA; 2010 Feb; 303(7):631-7. PubMed ID: 20159871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utility of genetic and non-genetic risk factors in prediction of type 2 diabetes: Whitehall II prospective cohort study.
Talmud PJ; Hingorani AD; Cooper JA; Marmot MG; Brunner EJ; Kumari M; Kivimäki M; Humphries SE
BMJ; 2010 Jan; 340():b4838. PubMed ID: 20075150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A genetic risk score of 45 coronary artery disease risk variants associates with increased risk of myocardial infarction in 6041 Danish individuals.
Krarup NT; Borglykke A; Allin KH; Sandholt CH; Justesen JM; Andersson EA; Grarup N; Jørgensen T; Pedersen O; Hansen T
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):305-10. PubMed ID: 25864160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictive Accuracy of a Polygenic Risk Score Compared With a Clinical Risk Score for Incident Coronary Heart Disease.
Mosley JD; Gupta DK; Tan J; Yao J; Wells QS; Shaffer CM; Kundu S; Robinson-Cohen C; Psaty BM; Rich SS; Post WS; Guo X; Rotter JI; Roden DM; Gerszten RE; Wang TJ
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(7):627-635. PubMed ID: 32068817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of clinical validity of a breast cancer risk model combining genetic and clinical information.
Mealiffe ME; Stokowski RP; Rhees BK; Prentice RL; Pettinger M; Hinds DA
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Nov; 102(21):1618-27. PubMed ID: 20956782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
