These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27366121)

  • 21. Development and Validation of a Rubric to Evaluate Diabetes SOAP Note Writing in APPE.
    Andrus MR; McDonough SLK; Kelley KW; Stamm PL; McCoy EK; Lisenby KM; Whitley HP; Slater N; Carroll DG; Hester EK; Helmer AM; Jackson CW; Byrd DC
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2018 Nov; 82(9):6725. PubMed ID: 30559501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dynamic online peer evaluations to improve group assignments in nursing e-learning environment.
    Adwan J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Jun; 41():67-72. PubMed ID: 27138485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can a reflective rubric be applied consistently with raters globally? A study across three countries.
    Lucas C; Smith L; Lonie JM; Hough M; Rogers K; Mantzourani E
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Oct; 11(10):987-994. PubMed ID: 31685182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Striving for interrater reliability with a patient counseling assessment rubric: Lessons learned.
    McKeirnan KC; Willson MN; Bray BS
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2020 Jun; 12(6):603-613. PubMed ID: 32482261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring inter-rater reliability of the sequenced performance inventory and reflective assessment of learning (SPIRAL).
    Olson L; Schieve AD; Ruit KG; Vari RC
    Acad Med; 2003 Aug; 78(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 12915381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Development and Validation of a Scoring Rubric for Editorial Evaluation of Peer-review Quality: A Pilot Study.
    Love JN; Messman AM; Ilgen JS; Merritt C; Coates WC; Ander DS; Way DP
    West J Emerg Med; 2024 Mar; 25(2):254-263. PubMed ID: 38596927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developing Validity Evidence for the Written Pediatric History and Physical Exam Evaluation Rubric.
    King MA; Phillipi CA; Buchanan PM; Lewin LO
    Acad Pediatr; 2017; 17(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 27521461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Writing Across the Curriculum: Reliability Testing of a Standardized Rubric.
    Minnich M; Kirkpatrick AJ; Goodman JT; Whittaker A; Stanton Chapple H; Schoening AM; Khanna MM
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Jun; 57(6):366-370. PubMed ID: 29863738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using the Clark Simulation Evaluation Rubric with associate degree and baccalaureate nursing students.
    Gantt LT
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2010; 31(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 20455367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Inter-rater Reliability of a Clinical Documentation Rubric Within Pharmacotherapy Problem-Based Learning Courses.
    Villa KR; Sprunger TL; Walton AM; Costello TJ; Isaacs AN
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2020 Jul; 84(7):ajpe7648. PubMed ID: 32773823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Information literacy needs in graduate-level health sciences education.
    Kleyman EZ; Tabaei S
    J Physician Assist Educ; 2012; 23(2):36-41. PubMed ID: 22827149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the relationship between peer and facilitator evaluations in case-based learning.
    Ferguson KJ; Kreiter CD
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):906-8. PubMed ID: 17696984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A rubric to assess critical literature evaluation skills.
    Blommel ML; Abate MA
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2007 Aug; 71(4):63. PubMed ID: 17786251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Psychometric testing of the Pecka Grading Rubric for evaluating higher-order thinking in distance learning.
    Pecka S; Schmid K; Pozehl B
    AANA J; 2014 Dec; 82(6):449-56. PubMed ID: 25842643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of rater selection on peer assessment among medical students.
    Lurie SJ; Nofziger AC; Meldrum S; Mooney C; Epstein RM
    Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 40(11):1088-97. PubMed ID: 17054618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating graduate and undergraduate nursing students' computer skills to determine the need to continue teaching computer literacy.
    Gassert CA; McDowell D
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():1370. PubMed ID: 8591450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills.
    Geithner CA; Pollastro AN
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2016 Mar; 40(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26847256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and psychometric testing of a clinical reasoning rubric based on the nursing process.
    Ramazanzadeh N; Ghahramanian A; Zamanzadeh V; Valizadeh L; Ghaffarifar S
    BMC Med Educ; 2023 Feb; 23(1):98. PubMed ID: 36750822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Promoting information literacy through collaborative service learning in an undergraduate research course.
    Janke R; Pesut B; Erbacker L
    Nurse Educ Today; 2012 Nov; 32(8):920-3. PubMed ID: 22036272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and initial validation of a project-based rubric to assess the systems-based practice competency of residents in the clinical chemistry rotation of a pathology residency.
    Vitek CR; Dale JC; Homburger HA; Bryant SC; Saenger AK; Karon BS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Jun; 138(6):809-13. PubMed ID: 24878020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.