234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27366817)
1. Comparison of stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Functional Mandibular Advancer in Class II division 1 treatment.
Aras I; Pasaoglu A; Olmez S; Unal I; Tuncer AV; Aras A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 27366817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upper airway changes following single-step or stepwise advancement using the Functional Mandibular Advancer.
Aras I; Pasaoglu A; Olmez S; Unal I; Aras A
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Nov; 77(6):454-462. PubMed ID: 27770150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.
Kinzinger GSM; Lisson JA; Frye L; Gross U; Hourfar J
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):293-304. PubMed ID: 28365810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.
Hourfar J; Lisson JA; Gross U; Frye L; Kinzinger GSM
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):971-980. PubMed ID: 28721528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mode of correction is related to treatment timing in Class II patients treated with the mandibular advancement locking unit (MALU) appliance.
Candir M; Kerosuo H
Angle Orthod; 2017 May; 87(3):363-370. PubMed ID: 28121165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance: a prospective evalution 7 years post-treatment.
Angelieri F; Franchi L; Cevidanes LH; Scanavini MA; McNamara JA
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 23736378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible.
Du X; Hägg U; Rabie AB
Eur J Orthod; 2002 Apr; 24(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 12001553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes in patients with a Class II relationship treated with clear aligner mandibular advancement and Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
Hosseini HR; Ngan P; Tai SK; Andrews LJ; Xiang J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Feb; 165(2):205-219. PubMed ID: 37831020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following incremental and maximum bite advancement during Herbst-rapid palatal expander appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients: a randomized non-controlled prospective clinical study.
Gul Amuk N; Kurt G; Baysal A; Turker G
Eur J Orthod; 2019 May; 41(3):322-330. PubMed ID: 30892615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal effects in class II treatment with the functional mandibular advancer (FMA)?
Kinzinger G; Diedrich P
J Orofac Orthop; 2005 Nov; 66(6):469-90. PubMed ID: 16331547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction of a Overjet and Overbite In Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Using Twin Block Appliance Therapy: A Case Report.
Shastri D; Tandon P; Singh GK; Singh A; Sharma S
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(4):19-22. PubMed ID: 27029087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stepwise versus single-step mandibular advancement with functional appliance in treating class II patients : A meta-analysis.
Chen Z; Chen Q; Fan X; Li Y; Mo S
J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Sep; 81(5):311-327. PubMed ID: 32415333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angle class II correction: stepwise mandibular advancement or bite jumping? : A systematic review and meta-analysis of skeletal, dental and condylar effects.
Knösel M; Espinoza-Espinoza GE; Sandoval-Vidal P; Zaror C
J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Jul; 81(4):286-300. PubMed ID: 32435862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fixed lingual mandibular growth modificator: a new appliance for class II correction.
Alali OH
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(4):70-81. PubMed ID: 24262419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of treatment outcomes with crowned and banded mandibular anterior repositioning appliance (MARA) in Class II pubertal subjects: A retrospective cohort study.
Al-Jewair T; Ghorbaniparvar M; Franchi L; Flores-Mir C
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 32111577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 2 treatment protocols using fixed functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: Treatment results and stability.
Bozkurt AP; Aras I; Othman E; Aras A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr; 157(4):474-480. PubMed ID: 32241354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of incremental vs maximum bite advancement during Herbst appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients.
Amuk NG; Baysal A; Coskun R; Kurt G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30591165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
