143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27367439)
1. The Indirect Effect of Source Information on Psychological Reactance Against Antismoking Messages Through Perceived Bias.
Kim H
Health Commun; 2017 May; 32(5):650-656. PubMed ID: 27367439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Qualitative study of Singaporean youths' perception of antismoking campaigns: what works and what does not.
Shahwan S; Fauziana R; Satghare P; Vaingankar J; Picco L; Chong SA; Subramaniam M
Tob Control; 2016 Dec; 25(e2):e101-e106. PubMed ID: 26944686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of empathy- versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs.
Shen L
Health Commun; 2011; 26(5):404-15. PubMed ID: 21409669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Smoking Is So Ew!: College Smokers' Reactions to Health- Versus Social-Focused Antismoking Threat Messages.
Wong NC; Nisbett GS; Harvell LA
Health Commun; 2017 Apr; 32(4):451-460. PubMed ID: 27314311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychological motives versus health concerns: predicting smoking attitudes and promoting antismoking attitudes.
Chang C
Health Commun; 2009 Jan; 24(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19204853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A close examination of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of psychological reactance theory.
Quick BL; Scott AM; Ledbetter AM
J Health Commun; 2011 Jul; 16(6):660-79. PubMed ID: 21391039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpersonal communication as an indirect pathway for the effect of antismoking media content on smoking cessation.
van den Putte B; Yzer M; Southwell BG; de Bruijn GJ; Willemsen MC
J Health Commun; 2011 May; 16(5):470-85. PubMed ID: 21337250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How the Media Effects Schema and the Persuasion Ethics Schema Affect Audience Responses to Antismoking Campaign Messages.
Paek HJ; Hove T
Health Commun; 2018 May; 33(5):526-536. PubMed ID: 28157398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of antismoking campaigns on nonsmokers in South Korea: perceived threat, attribution, and help-giving.
Choi J; Jeong JS
Psychol Health Med; 2021 Mar; 26(3):366-374. PubMed ID: 32286083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Reactance against Cigarette Warning Labels Matter? Warning Label Responses and Downstream Smoking Cessation amongst Adult Smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United States.
Cho YJ; Thrasher JF; Swayampakala K; Yong HH; McKeever R; Hammond D; Anshari D; Cummings KM; Borland R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159245. PubMed ID: 27411100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of antismoking media on college students' smoking-related beliefs and intentions.
Martino SC; Setodji CM; Dunbar MS; Gong M; Shadel WG
Psychol Addict Behav; 2018 Feb; 32(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 29189021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Communication, Reasoning, and Planned Behaviors: Unveiling the Effect of Interactive Communication in an Anti-Smoking Social Media Campaign.
Namkoong K; Nah S; Record RA; Van Stee SK
Health Commun; 2017 Jan; 32(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27119592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defensive evaluation of antismoking messages among college-age smokers: the role of possible selves.
Freeman MA; Hennessy EV; Marzullo DM
Health Psychol; 2001 Nov; 20(6):424-33. PubMed ID: 11714184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhancing the effectiveness of antismoking messages via self-congruent appeals.
Chang C
Health Commun; 2009 Jan; 24(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19204856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Designing messages with high sensation value: when activation meets reactance.
Xu J
Psychol Health; 2015; 30(4):423-40. PubMed ID: 25321175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which Type of Antismoking Advertisement Is Perceived as More Effective? An Experimental Study With a Sample of Australian Socially Disadvantaged Welfare Recipients.
Guillaumier A; Bonevski B; Paul C; d'Este C; Durkin S; Doran C
Am J Health Promot; 2017 May; 31(3):209-216. PubMed ID: 26559713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Friends Don't Let Friends Smoke: How Storytelling and Social Distance Influence Nonsmokers' Responses to Antismoking Messages.
Ma Z; Nan X
Health Commun; 2018 Jul; 33(7):887-895. PubMed ID: 28586249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Content characteristics driving the diffusion of antismoking messages: implications for cancer prevention in the emerging public communication environment.
Kim HS; Lee S; Cappella JN; Vera L; Emery S
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2013 Dec; 2013(47):182-7. PubMed ID: 24395989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Priming effect of antismoking PSAs on smoking behaviour: a pilot study.
Harris JL; Pierce M; Bargh JA
Tob Control; 2014 Jul; 23(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 23322312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anger Expression Moderates the Effects of Psychological Reactance to Sexual Health Messages.
Richards AS; Larsen M
Health Commun; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1491-1500. PubMed ID: 27824262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
