These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27367856)
1. Strategies for Health System Innovation After Gobeille v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Bland SE; Crowley JS; Gostin LO JAMA; 2016 Aug; 316(6):581-2. PubMed ID: 27367856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical record privacy and state health reform after Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. Yang YT; Chen B Am J Manag Care; 2016 Jul; 22(7):472-4. PubMed ID: 27442202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. All-Payer Claims Databases - Uses and Expanded Prospects after Gobeille. Freedman JD; Green L; Landon BE N Engl J Med; 2016 Dec; 375(23):2215-2217. PubMed ID: 27959673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. 'MetLife V. Glenn': the Court addresses a conflict over conflicts in ERISA benefit administration. Jost TS Health Aff (Millwood); 2008; 27(5):w430-40. PubMed ID: 18768537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability. Mariner WK N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of delegation on standard of review. Geddes v. United Staffing, 469 F.3d 919 (10th Cir. 2006). Benefits Q; 2009; 25(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 19408446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subrogation or subterfuge: the myth of ERISA health benefit plans. Murphy GF J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2002; 19(1):309-33. PubMed ID: 12733230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court strikes down state regulation of health plan coverage decisions. Meadors GM J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 15672906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974; rules and regulations for administration and enforcement; claims procedure--Department of Labor. Notice of proposed rulemaking. Fed Regist; 1998 Sep; 63(174):48390-409. PubMed ID: 10185189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transparency and the Supreme Court--Can Employers Refuse to Disclose How Much They Pay for Health Care? Bagley N; Koller C N Engl J Med; 2015 Dec; 373(27):e34. PubMed ID: 26605801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. U.S. Supreme Court wades into ERISA one more time. Roeder KH; Rees JS GHA Today; 2004 Aug; 48(7):3, 9. PubMed ID: 15500273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reigning in ERISA preemption? Any willing provider statutes after New York Blue Cross Plans v. Travelers Insurance Co. Einhorn T J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 13(1):265-97. PubMed ID: 9068244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Marketplace. New U.S. appeals court ruling opens wide holes in ERISA preemption. Moskowitz DB Med Health; 1998 Jul; 52(28):suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 10181086 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Should your ERISA remedy depend upon your geography?: an analysis of Rush Prudential HMO, INC. v. Moran. Schulz AM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2003; 19(2):553-71. PubMed ID: 14748257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller. Gutmann V J Law Med Ethics; 2003; 31(4):729-31. PubMed ID: 14968676 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Workers of the world, panic! Parloff R Fortune; 2004 Jul; 150(1):36, 38. PubMed ID: 15270460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]