These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27370155)
1. Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: Case study on a commercial scanner. Persson M; Bujila R; Nowik P; Andersson H; Kull L; Andersson J; Bornefalk H; Danielsson M Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4398. PubMed ID: 27370155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation. Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique. Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Localizer Radiography Projection on Organ Dose at Chest CT with Automatic Tube Current Modulation. Saltybaeva N; Krauss A; Alkadhi H Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):842-849. PubMed ID: 27548276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms. McKenney SE; Seibert JA; Lamba R; Boone JM J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24589404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Dose-Length Product-Based and Monte Carlo Simulation Organ-Based Calculations of Effective Dose in 16- and 64-MDCT Examinations Using Automatic Tube Current Modulation. Haji-Momenian S; Ellenbogen A; Khati N; Taffel M; Earls J; Miller G; Zeman RK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):583-592. PubMed ID: 29381379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Creation of an atlas of filter positions for fluence field modulated CT. Szczykutowicz TP; Hermus J Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1779-86. PubMed ID: 25832068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions. Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of an open source Monte Carlo dosimetry model for wide-beam CT scanners using Fluka. Somasundaram E; Artz NS; Brady SL J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):132-147. PubMed ID: 30851155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Organ doses evaluation for chest computed tomography procedures with TL dosimeters: Comparison with Monte Carlo simulations. Giansante L; Martins JC; Nersissian DY; Kiers KC; Kay FU; Sawamura MVY; Lee C; Gebrim EMMS; Costa PR J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 20(1):308-320. PubMed ID: 30508315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reference dosimetry during diagnostic CT examination using XR-QA radiochromic film model. Boivin J; Tomic N; Fadlallah B; Deblois F; Devic S Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5119-29. PubMed ID: 21978057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms. DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method of predicting the image noise in paediatric multi-slice computed tomography images. Ledenius K; Gustavsson M; Johansson S; Stålhammar F; Söderberg J; Wiklund LM; Thilander Klang A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):313-6. PubMed ID: 15933128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Considerations on an automatic computed tomography tube current modulation system. Moro L; Panizza D; D'Ambrosio D; Carne I Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Oct; 156(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 23584497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of image noise contributions in proton computed tomography and comparison to measurements. Dickmann J; Wesp P; Rädler M; Rit S; Pankuch M; Johnson RP; Bashkirov V; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Landry G; Dedes G Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 64(14):145016. PubMed ID: 31125986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography. van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human Imaging With Photon Counting-Based Computed Tomography at Clinical Dose Levels: Contrast-to-Noise Ratio and Cadaver Studies. Gutjahr R; Halaweish AF; Yu Z; Leng S; Yu L; Li Z; Jorgensen SM; Ritman EL; Kappler S; McCollough CH Invest Radiol; 2016 Jul; 51(7):421-9. PubMed ID: 26818529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertical off-centering affects organ dose in chest CT: Evidence from Monte Carlo simulations in anthropomorphic phantoms. Saltybaeva N; Alkadhi H Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5697-5704. PubMed ID: 28817195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A measurement-based X-ray source model characterization for CT dosimetry computations. Sommerville M; Poirier Y; Tambasco M J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):386-400. PubMed ID: 26699546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]