448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27370904)
1. Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Gómez S; Vlad MD; López J; Fernández E
Acta Biomater; 2016 Sep; 42():341-350. PubMed ID: 27370904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study.
Truscello S; Kerckhofs G; Van Bael S; Pyka G; Schrooten J; Van Oosterwyck H
Acta Biomater; 2012 Apr; 8(4):1648-58. PubMed ID: 22210520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Numerical and experimental evaluation of TPMS Gyroid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Castro APG; Ruben RB; Gonçalves SB; Pinheiro J; Guedes JM; Fernandes PR
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 May; 22(6):567-573. PubMed ID: 30773050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microstructure and compression properties of 3D powder printed Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds with designed porosity: Experimental and computational analysis.
Barui S; Chatterjee S; Mandal S; Kumar A; Basu B
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2017 Jan; 70(Pt 1):812-823. PubMed ID: 27770959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fatigue behavior of As-built selective laser melted titanium scaffolds with sheet-based gyroid microarchitecture for bone tissue engineering.
Kelly CN; Francovich J; Julmi S; Safranski D; Guldberg RE; Maier HJ; Gall K
Acta Biomater; 2019 Aug; 94():610-626. PubMed ID: 31125727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The design and evaluation of bionic porous bone scaffolds in fluid flow characteristics and mechanical properties.
Li X; Wang Y; Zhang B; Yang H; Mushtaq RT; Liu M; Bao C; Shi Y; Luo Z; Zhang W
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107059. PubMed ID: 35964422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilayer hydroxyapatite scaffolds for maxillofacial bone tissue engineering.
Guda T; Oh S; Appleford MR; Ong JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 22442766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Synthetic open cell foams versus a healthy human vertebra: Anisotropy, fluid flow and μ-CT structural studies.
Gómez González S; Valera Jiménez JF; Cabestany Bastida G; Vlad MD; López López J; Fernández Aguado E
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Mar; 108():110404. PubMed ID: 31923939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and properties of biomimetic irregular scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Chen H; Liu Y; Wang C; Zhang A; Chen B; Han Q; Wang J
Comput Biol Med; 2021 Mar; 130():104241. PubMed ID: 33529844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-objective Shape Optimization of Bone Scaffolds: Enhancement of Mechanical Properties and Permeability.
Foroughi AH; Razavi MJ
Acta Biomater; 2022 Jul; 146():317-340. PubMed ID: 35533924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Design and performance study of bone trabecular scaffolds based on triply periodic minimal surface method].
Men Y; Tang S; Chen W; Liu F; Zhang C
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Jun; 41(3):584-594. PubMed ID: 38932546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Permeability and mechanical properties of gradient porous PDMS scaffolds fabricated by 3D-printed sacrificial templates designed with minimal surfaces.
Montazerian H; Mohamed MGA; Montazeri MM; Kheiri S; Milani AS; Kim K; Hoorfar M
Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 96():149-160. PubMed ID: 31252172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D-printed scaffolds with calcified layer for osteochondral tissue engineering.
Li Z; Jia S; Xiong Z; Long Q; Yan S; Hao F; Liu J; Yuan Z
J Biosci Bioeng; 2018 Sep; 126(3):389-396. PubMed ID: 29685821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel porous Ti35Zr28Nb scaffolds fabricated by powder metallurgy with excellent osteointegration ability for bone-tissue engineering applications.
Xu W; Tian J; Liu Z; Lu X; Hayat MD; Yan Y; Li Z; Qu X; Wen C
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2019 Dec; 105():110015. PubMed ID: 31546430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface modification of 3D-printed porous scaffolds via mussel-inspired polydopamine and effective immobilization of rhBMP-2 to promote osteogenic differentiation for bone tissue engineering.
Lee SJ; Lee D; Yoon TR; Kim HK; Jo HH; Park JS; Lee JH; Kim WD; Kwon IK; Park SA
Acta Biomater; 2016 Aug; 40():182-191. PubMed ID: 26868173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Permeability of Trabecular-Like Porous Scaffold by Additive Manufacturing.
Chao L; Jiao C; Liang H; Xie D; Shen L; Liu Z
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():779854. PubMed ID: 34993188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preparation and mechanical property of a novel 3D porous magnesium scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
Zhang X; Li XW; Li JG; Sun XD
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Sep; 42():362-7. PubMed ID: 25063129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between the morphological, mechanical and permeability properties of porous bone scaffolds and the underlying microstructure.
Lu Y; Cheng L; Yang Z; Li J; Zhu H
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238471. PubMed ID: 32870933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of scaffold architecture on properties of direct 3D fiber deposition of porous Ti6Al4V for orthopedic implants.
Li JP; de Wijn JR; van Blitterswijk CA; de Groot K
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jan; 92(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 19165798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel method for biomaterial scaffold internal architecture design to match bone elastic properties with desired porosity.
Lin CY; Kikuchi N; Hollister SJ
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):623-36. PubMed ID: 15046991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
