These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27371786)

  • 1. A novel hybrid MCDM model for performance evaluation of research and technology organizations based on BSC approach.
    Varmazyar M; Dehghanbaghi M; Afkhami M
    Eval Program Plann; 2016 Oct; 58():125-140. PubMed ID: 27371786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard.
    Wu HY; Lin YK; Chang CH
    Eval Program Plann; 2011 Feb; 34(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 20619892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Green material selection for sustainability: A hybrid MCDM approach.
    Zhang H; Peng Y; Tian G; Wang D; Xie P
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177578. PubMed ID: 28498864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard.
    Wu HY
    Eval Program Plann; 2012 Aug; 35(3):303-20. PubMed ID: 22410163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Novel Integration of IF-DEMATEL and TOPSIS for the Classifier Selection Problem in Assistive Technology Adoption for People with Dementia.
    Ortíz-Barrios MA; Garcia-Constantino M; Nugent C; Alfaro-Sarmiento I
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing a strategy map for forensic accounting with fraud risk management: An integrated balanced scorecard-based decision model.
    Yang CH; Lee KC
    Eval Program Plann; 2020 Jun; 80():101780. PubMed ID: 32044113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of consolidative multi-criteria decision making (C-MCDM) algorithms for optimal mapping of polymer materials in additive manufacturing: A case study of orthotic application.
    Mian SH; Abouel Nasr E; Moiduddin K; Saleh M; Abidi MH; Alkhalefah H
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e30867. PubMed ID: 38770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel hybrid evaluation framework for public organizations based on employees' performance factors.
    Afrasiabi A; Chalmardi MK; Balezentis T
    Eval Program Plann; 2022 Apr; 91():102020. PubMed ID: 34716020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for Building Materials Supplier Selection.
    Chen CH
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Nov; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 34945903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating Environmental and Social Sustainability Into Performance Evaluation: A Balanced Scorecard-Based Grey-DANP Approach for the Food Industry.
    Duman GM; Taskaynatan M; Kongar E; Rosentrater KA
    Front Nutr; 2018; 5():65. PubMed ID: 30083535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal evaluation of crop residues for gasification in Ghana using integrated multi-criterial decision making techniques.
    Osei I; Addo A; Kemausuor F
    Heliyon; 2023 Oct; 9(10):e20553. PubMed ID: 37822638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance evaluation of Al-Zahra academic medical center based on Iran balanced scorecard model.
    Raeisi AR; Yarmohammadian MH; Bakhsh RM; Gangi H
    J Educ Health Promot; 2012; 1():1. PubMed ID: 23555104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of smart and sustainable cities through a hybrid MCDM approach based on ANP and TOPSIS technique.
    Ozkaya G; Erdin C
    Heliyon; 2020 Oct; 6(10):e05052. PubMed ID: 33117896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Near-Earth object hazardous impact: A Multi-Criteria Decision Making approach.
    Sánchez-Lozano JM; Fernández-Martínez M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():37055. PubMed ID: 27848986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Financial Network Analysis on the Performance of Companies Using Integrated Entropy-DEMATEL-TOPSIS Model.
    Liew KF; Lam WS; Lam WH
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Jul; 24(8):. PubMed ID: 36010720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
    Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to select appropriate biomass resources for biofuel production.
    Firouzi S; Allahyari MS; Isazadeh M; Nikkhah A; Van Haute S
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 May; 770():144449. PubMed ID: 33513499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Investment Projects of Spinal Medical Device Firms Using the Real Option and DANP-mV Based MCDM Methods.
    Huang CY; Hsieh HL; Chen H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32403356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proposal for an objective binary benchmarking framework that validates each other for comparing MCDM methods through data analytics.
    Baydaş M; Eren T; Stević Ž; Starčević V; Parlakkaya R
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1350. PubMed ID: 37153010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.