674 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27372275)
1. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.
Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.
Montoye AHK; Westgate BS; Fonley MR; Pfeiffer KA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2018 May; 124(5):1284-1293. PubMed ID: 29369742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Staudenmayer J; Lanckriet G
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 26673126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensor-enabled Activity Class Recognition in Preschoolers: Hip versus Wrist Data.
Trost SG; Cliff DP; Ahmadi MN; Tuc NV; Hagenbuchner M
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Mar; 50(3):634-641. PubMed ID: 29059107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of Activity Classification Algorithms in Free-Living Older Adults.
Sasaki JE; Hickey AM; Staudenmayer JW; John D; Kent JA; Freedson PS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 26673129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A random forest classifier for the prediction of energy expenditure and type of physical activity from wrist and hip accelerometers.
Ellis K; Kerr J; Godbole S; Lanckriet G; Wing D; Marshall S
Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2191-203. PubMed ID: 25340969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The validity of the GENEActiv wrist-worn accelerometer for measuring adult sedentary time in free living.
Pavey TG; Gomersall SR; Clark BK; Brown WJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2016 May; 19(5):395-9. PubMed ID: 25956687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults.
Hildebrand M; Hansen BH; van Hees VT; Ekelund U
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1814-1823. PubMed ID: 27878845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wrist-Worn Accelerometer-Brand Independent Posture Classification.
Rowlands AV; Yates T; Olds TS; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Apr; 48(4):748-54. PubMed ID: 26559451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Free-living Evaluation of Laboratory-based Activity Classifiers in Preschoolers.
Ahmadi MN; Brookes D; Chowdhury A; Pavey T; Trost SG
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2020 May; 52(5):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 31764460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Machine learning for activity recognition: hip versus wrist data.
Trost SG; Zheng Y; Wong WK
Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2183-9. PubMed ID: 25340887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer.
Zhang S; Rowlands AV; Murray P; Hurst TL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 21988935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing sedentary behavior with the GENEActiv: introducing the sedentary sphere.
Rowlands AV; Olds TS; Hillsdon M; Pulsford R; Hurst TL; Eston RG; Gomersall SR; Johnston K; Langford J
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Jun; 46(6):1235-47. PubMed ID: 24263980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.
Knaier R; Höchsmann C; Infanger D; Hinrichs T; Schmidt-Trucksäss A
BMC Public Health; 2019 Feb; 19(1):244. PubMed ID: 30819148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving Hip-Worn Accelerometer Estimates of Sitting Using Machine Learning Methods.
Kerr J; Carlson J; Godbole S; Cadmus-Bertram L; Bellettiere J; Hartman S
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1518-1524. PubMed ID: 29443824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine Learning Models for Classifying Physical Activity in Free-Living Preschool Children.
Ahmadi MN; Pavey TG; Trost SG
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Aug; 20(16):. PubMed ID: 32764316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.
Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accelerometer wear-site detection: When one site does not suit all, all of the time.
Rowlands AV; Olds TS; Bakrania K; Stanley RM; Parfitt G; Eston RG; Yates T; Fraysse F
J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Apr; 20(4):368-372. PubMed ID: 28117147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5-8 years old.
Duncan MJ; Wilson S; Tallis J; Eyre E
Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Dec; 175(12):2019-2021. PubMed ID: 27785561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validating the Sedentary Sphere method in children: Does wrist or accelerometer brand matter?
Hurter L; Rowlands AV; Fairclough SJ; Gibbon KC; Knowles ZR; Porcellato LA; Cooper-Ryan AM; Boddy LM
J Sports Sci; 2019 Aug; 37(16):1910-1918. PubMed ID: 31012798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
