These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27372844)

  • 21. Dry tDCS: Tolerability of a novel multilayer hydrogel composite non-adhesive electrode for transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Khadka N; Borges H; Zannou AL; Jang J; Kim B; Lee K; Bikson M
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):1044-1053. PubMed ID: 30072144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prefrontal versus motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on post-surgical opioid use.
    Borckardt JJ; Reeves ST; Milliken C; Carter B; Epperson TI; Gunselman RJ; Madan A; Del Schutte H; Demos HA; George MS
    Brain Stimul; 2017; 10(6):1096-1101. PubMed ID: 28917592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sham transcranial electrical stimulation and its effects on corticospinal excitability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dissanayaka TD; Zoghi M; Farrell M; Egan GF; Jaberzadeh S
    Rev Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 29(2):223-232. PubMed ID: 28889119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Borges H; Dufau A; Paneri B; Woods AJ; Knotkova H; Bikson M
    J Vis Exp; 2020 Jan; (155):. PubMed ID: 31957745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.
    Ho KA; Taylor JL; Chew T; Gálvez V; Alonzo A; Bai S; Dokos S; Loo CK
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26350410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Safety of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation: A systematic review.
    Nikolin S; Huggins C; Martin D; Alonzo A; Loo CK
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(2):278-288. PubMed ID: 29169814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reducing transcranial direct current stimulation-induced erythema with skin pretreatment: considerations for sham-controlled clinical trials.
    Guarienti F; Caumo W; Shiozawa P; Cordeiro Q; Boggio PS; Benseñor IM; Lotufo PA; Bikson M; Brunoni AR
    Neuromodulation; 2015 Jun; 18(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 25209456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ten minutes of 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation was well tolerated by children and adolescents: Self-reports and resting state EEG analysis.
    Moliadze V; Andreas S; Lyzhko E; Schmanke T; Gurashvili T; Freitag CM; Siniatchkin M
    Brain Res Bull; 2015 Oct; 119(Pt A):25-33. PubMed ID: 26449209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A novel tDCS sham approach based on model-driven controlled shunting.
    Neri F; Mencarelli L; Menardi A; Giovannelli F; Rossi S; Sprugnoli G; Rossi A; Pascual-Leone A; Salvador R; Ruffini G; Santarnecchi E
    Brain Stimul; 2020; 13(2):507-516. PubMed ID: 31926812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. EEG modulation by different transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) montages: a randomized double-blind sham-control mechanistic pilot trial in healthy participants.
    El-Hagrassy M; Duarte D; Lu J; Uygur-Kucukseymen E; Münger M; Thibaut A; Lv P; Morales-Quezada L; Fregni F
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Jan; 18(1):107-120. PubMed ID: 33305643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Systematic Review on the Acceptability and Tolerability of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Neuropsychiatry Trials.
    Aparício LVM; Guarienti F; Razza LB; Carvalho AF; Fregni F; Brunoni AR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(5):671-681. PubMed ID: 27261431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Online and offline effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy older adults: a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study.
    Samaei A; Ehsani F; Zoghi M; Hafez Yosephi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 May; 45(9):1177-1185. PubMed ID: 28278354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perception of comfort during active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation: a double blind study.
    Russo R; Wallace D; Fitzgerald PB; Cooper NR
    Brain Stimul; 2013 Nov; 6(6):946-51. PubMed ID: 23835166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. When size matters: large electrodes induce greater stimulation-related cutaneous discomfort than smaller electrodes at equivalent current density.
    Turi Z; Ambrus GG; Ho KA; Sengupta T; Paulus W; Antal A
    Brain Stimul; 2014; 7(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 24582373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Influence of Skin Redness on Blinding in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Studies: A Crossover Trial.
    Ezquerro F; Moffa AH; Bikson M; Khadka N; Aparicio LV; de Sampaio-Junior B; Fregni F; Bensenor IM; Lotufo PA; Pereira AC; Brunoni AR
    Neuromodulation; 2017 Apr; 20(3):248-255. PubMed ID: 27704654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differential effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal, motor and somatosensory cortices on cortical excitability and pain perception - a double-blind randomised sham-controlled study.
    Vaseghi B; Zoghi M; Jaberzadeh S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 42(7):2426-37. PubMed ID: 26275236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Limited output transcranial electrical stimulation (LOTES-2017): Engineering principles, regulatory statutes, and industry standards for wellness, over-the-counter, or prescription devices with low risk.
    Bikson M; Paneri B; Mourdoukoutas A; Esmaeilpour Z; Badran BW; Azzam R; Adair D; Datta A; Fang XH; Wingeier B; Chao D; Alonso-Alonso M; Lee K; Knotkova H; Woods AJ; Hagedorn D; Jeffery D; Giordano J; Tyler WJ
    Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(1):134-157. PubMed ID: 29122535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical utility and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in mild cognitive impairment.
    Murugaraja V; Shivakumar V; Sivakumar PT; Sinha P; Venkatasubramanian G
    Asian J Psychiatr; 2017 Dec; 30():135-140. PubMed ID: 28934620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 min in young healthy adults.
    Turi Z; Csifcsák G; Boayue NM; Aslaksen P; Antal A; Paulus W; Groot J; Hawkins GE; Forstmann B; Opitz A; Thielscher A; Mittner M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 50(8):3261-3268. PubMed ID: 30888090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.