79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27374136)
1. The Effect of False-Positive Results on Subsequent Participation in Chest X-ray Screening for Lung Cancer.
Sato A; Hamada S; Urashima Y; Tanaka S; Okamoto H; Kawakami K
J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):646-653. PubMed ID: 27374136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examining the effects of false positive lung cancer screening results on subsequent lung cancer screening adherence.
Ford ME; Havstad SL; Flickinger L; Johnson CC
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Jan; 12(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 12540500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial.
Croswell JM; Baker SG; Marcus PM; Clapp JD; Kramer BS
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):505-12, W176-80. PubMed ID: 20404381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. False positive results do not have a negative effect on reattendance for subsequent breast screening.
O'Sullivan I; Sutton S; Dixon S; Perry N
J Med Screen; 2001; 8(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 11678554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of life and trial adherence among participants in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.
Taylor KL; Shelby R; Gelmann E; McGuire C
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Jul; 96(14):1083-94. PubMed ID: 15265970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases.
Seigneurin A; Exbrayat C; Labarère J; Delafosse P; Poncet F; Colonna M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 May; 127(1):221-8. PubMed ID: 20809364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cumulative risk of false-positive results in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: updated results.
Roman M; Hubbard RA; Sebuodegard S; Miglioretti DL; Castells X; Hofvind S
Cancer; 2013 Nov; 119(22):3952-8. PubMed ID: 23963877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.
Castells X; Molins E; Macià F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Apr; 60(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 16537348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A meta-analysis: is low-dose computed tomography a superior method for risky lung cancers screening population?
Fu C; Liu Z; Zhu F; Li S; Jiang L
Clin Respir J; 2016 May; 10(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 25307063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of lung cancer through low-dose CT screening (NELSON): a prespecified analysis of screening test performance and interval cancers.
Horeweg N; Scholten ET; de Jong PA; van der Aalst CM; Weenink C; Lammers JW; Nackaerts K; Vliegenthart R; ten Haaf K; Yousaf-Khan UA; Heuvelmans MA; Thunnissen E; Oudkerk M; Mali W; de Koning HJ
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Nov; 15(12):1342-50. PubMed ID: 25282284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with false-positive and false-negative fecal immunochemical test results for colorectal cancer screening.
Wong MC; Ching JY; Chan VC; Lam TY; Luk AK; Ng SS; Sung JJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Mar; 81(3):596-607. PubMed ID: 25293827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Factors associated with participation in chest X-ray screening by young and middle aged residents].
Fukunaga I; Jitsunari F; Takeda N; Maruyama Y; Kitamado T; Shiraishi H; Hoshikawa Y; Asakawa F; Kasai S
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1998 Aug; 45(8):693-703. PubMed ID: 9809004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of breast cancer after false-positive test results in screening mammography.
von Euler-Chelpin M; Risør LM; Thorsted BL; Vejborg I
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2012 May; 104(9):682-9. PubMed ID: 22491228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on long-term adherence to breast cancer screening.
Román R; Sala M; De La Vega M; Natal C; Galceran J; González-Román I; Baroja A; Zubizarreta R; Ascunce N; Salas D; Castells X
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Nov; 130(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 21617920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme.
Andersen SB; Vejborg I; von Euler-Chelpin M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):550-5. PubMed ID: 18465321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of false-positive results on reattendance at breast cancer screening programmes in Spain.
Alamo-Junquera D; Murta-Nascimento C; Macià F; Baré M; Galcerán J; Ascunce N; Zubizarreta R; Salas D; Román R; Castells X; Sala M;
Eur J Public Health; 2012 Jun; 22(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 21558152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer detection risk in screening mammography after a false-positive result.
Castells X; Román M; Romero A; Blanch J; Zubizarreta R; Ascunce N; Salas D; Burón A; Sala M;
Cancer Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 37(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 23142338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of false positive breast screening examinations on subsequent attendance: retrospective cohort study.
Maxwell AJ; Beattie C; Lavelle J; Lyburn I; Sinnatamby R; Garnett S; Herbert A
J Med Screen; 2013 Jun; 20(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 24009091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-selection effects in smokers attending lung cancer screening: a 9.5-year population-based cohort study in Varese, Italy.
Dominioni L; Rotolo N; Poli A; Paolucci M; Sessa F; D'Ambrosio V; Paddeu A; Mantovani W; Imperatori A
J Thorac Oncol; 2010 Apr; 5(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 20142770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
