These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

517 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27374479)

  • 21. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
    Luo X; Garrett C
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Reiss LA; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Gantz BJ
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 256():43-52. PubMed ID: 24157931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Matching the pitch perception of the cochlear implanted ear with the contralateral ear in patients with single-sided deafness: a novel approach.
    Tóth TF; Németh A; Bakó P; Révész P; Gerlinger I; Szanyi I
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Nov; 280(11):4851-4859. PubMed ID: 37133499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cochlear implant patients' speech understanding in background noise: effect of mismatch between electrode assigned frequencies and perceived pitch.
    Di Nardo W; Scorpecci A; Giannantonio S; Cianfrone F; Parrilla C; Paludetti G
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Aug; 124(8):828-34. PubMed ID: 20202276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.
    Zeng FG; Tang Q; Lu T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88662. PubMed ID: 24551131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants.
    Hochmair I; Hochmair E; Nopp P; Waller M; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():14-23. PubMed ID: 25456089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Tao D; Deng R; Jiang Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Chen B
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 25099401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners.
    Başkent D; Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3130-40. PubMed ID: 15603158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Association Between Flat-Panel Computed Tomographic Imaging-Guided Place-Pitch Mapping and Speech and Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jiam NT; Gilbert M; Cooke D; Jiradejvong P; Barrett K; Caldwell M; Limb CJ
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Feb; 145(2):109-116. PubMed ID: 30477013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.
    Zhou X; Li H; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan W
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S41-S48. PubMed ID: 27367147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.
    Gfeller K; Turner C; Oleson J; Zhang X; Gantz B; Froman R; Olszewski C
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):412-23. PubMed ID: 17485990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users.
    Munjal T; Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S121-8. PubMed ID: 26561883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Temporal Pitch Perception in Cochlear-Implant Users: Channel Independence in Apical Cochlear Regions.
    Griessner A; Schatzer R; Steixner V; Rajan GP; Zierhofer C; Távora-Vieira D
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211020645. PubMed ID: 34041983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Processing of speech temporal and spectral information by users of auditory brainstem implants and cochlear implants.
    Azadpour M; McKay CM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e192-203. PubMed ID: 25010634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
    McDermott HJ
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A potential neurophysiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in adult cochlear implant users: Pilot data.
    Tan CT; Martin BA; Svirsky MA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Jul; 19(4):198-209. PubMed ID: 29508662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Electric to acoustic pitch matching: a possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting.
    Nardo WD; Cantore I; Marchese MR; Cianfrone F; Scorpecci A; Giannantonio S; Paludetti G
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Nov; 265(11):1321-8. PubMed ID: 18379812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrocochleography-Based Tonotopic Map: II. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Speech-Perception Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Walia A; Shew MA; Varghese J; Lefler SM; Bhat A; Ortmann AJ; Herzog JA; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2024 Nov-Dec 01; 45(6):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 38880958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.