These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27375066)

  • 1. Comparison of Compass and Humphrey perimeters in detecting glaucomatous defects.
    Fogagnolo P; Modarelli A; Oddone F; Digiuni M; Montesano G; Orzalesi N; Rossetti L
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 26(6):598-606. PubMed ID: 27375066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients.
    Morbio R; Longo C; De Vitto AML; Comacchio F; Della Porta LB; Marchini G
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul; 31(4):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 32722931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Montesano G; Bryan SR; Crabb DP; Fogagnolo P; Oddone F; McKendrick AM; Turpin A; Lanzetta P; Perdicchi A; Johnson CA; Garway-Heath DF; Brusini P; Rossetti LM
    Ophthalmology; 2019 Feb; 126(2):242-251. PubMed ID: 30114416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicenter Comparison of the Toronto Portable Perimeter with the Humphrey Field Analyzer: A Pilot Study.
    Ahmed Y; Pereira A; Bowden S; Shi RB; Li Y; Ahmed IIK; Arshinoff SA
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2022; 5(2):146-159. PubMed ID: 34358734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Matrix with Humphrey Field Analyzer II with SITA.
    Fredette MJ; Giguère A; Anderson DR; Budenz DL; McSoley J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 25875683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Prospective randomized comparative study of frequency doubling perimetry vs standard automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma].
    Kampmeier J; Eisert B; Buchwald HJ; Lang GK; Lang GE
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Mar; 218(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 11322052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.
    Chen YH; Wu JN; Chen JT; Lu DW
    Ophthalmologica; 2008; 222(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 18781091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Kang J; De Arrigunaga S; Freeman SE; Zhao Y; Lin M; Liebman DL; Roldan AM; Kim JA; Chang DS; Friedman DS; Elze T
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of the Amsler Grid Test in Evaluating Glaucomatous Central Visual Field Defects.
    Su D; Greenberg A; Simonson JL; Teng CC; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Park SC
    Ophthalmology; 2016 Apr; 123(4):737-43. PubMed ID: 26783097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyser.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham SL
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 20447123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic ability of Humphrey perimetry, Octopus perimetry, and optical coherence tomography for glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
    Monsalve B; Ferreras A; Calvo P; Urcola JA; Figus M; Monsalve J; Frezzotti P
    Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):443-451. PubMed ID: 27834960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients.
    Phu J; Wang H; Kalloniatis M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37803502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V; Kong GXY; Singh A; Panigrahi A; Gupta S; Prea S; Vingrys AJ
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased Depth, Reduced Extent, and Sharpened Edges of Visual Field Defects Measured by Compass Fundus Perimeter Compared to Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Liu P; Nguyen BN; Turpin A; McKendrick AM
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 10(12):33. PubMed ID: 34694332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of an iPad Application to Detect Moderate and Advanced Visual Field Loss in Nepal.
    Johnson CA; Thapa S; George Kong YX; Robin AL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():147-154. PubMed ID: 28844641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T; Eslani M; Weinreb RN; Arias J; Vasile C; Mohammadzadeh V; Moghimi S
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters.
    Landers J; Sharma A; Goldberg I; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jun; 87(6):690-4. PubMed ID: 12770962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of threshold estimation and learning effect of two perimetric strategies, SITA Fast and CLIP, in damaged visual fields.
    Capris P; Autuori S; Capris E; Papadia M
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2008; 18(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 18320509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression.
    Wall M; Johnson CA; Zamba KD
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.