These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27375971)

  • 21. Quartets MaxCut: a divide and conquer quartets algorithm.
    Snir S; Rao S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2010; 7(4):704-18. PubMed ID: 21030737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [A fast algorithm to build a supertree with a set of gene trees].
    Gorbunov KIu; Liubetskiĭ VA
    Mol Biol (Mosk); 2012; 46(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 22642116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An application of supertree methods to Mammalian mitogenomic sequences.
    Campbell V; Lapointe FJ
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2010 May; 6():57-71. PubMed ID: 20535231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of flip supertree construction with a heuristic algorithm.
    Eulenstein O; Chen D; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2004 Apr; 53(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 15205054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robustness of topological supertree methods for reconciling dense incompatible data.
    Willson SJ
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 19179699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Imputing supertrees and supernetworks from quartets.
    Holland B; Conner G; Huber K; Moulton V
    Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 17366137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A simulation study comparing supertree and combined analysis methods using SMIDGen.
    Swenson MS; Barbançon F; Warnow T; Linder CR
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2010 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 20047664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implementing and testing Bayesian and maximum-likelihood supertree methods in phylogenetics.
    Akanni WA; Wilkinson M; Creevey CJ; Foster PG; Pisani D
    R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Aug; 2(8):140436. PubMed ID: 26361544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Synthesizing large-scale species trees using the strict consensus approach.
    Moon J; Eulenstein O
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 15(3):1740002. PubMed ID: 28513253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of the accuracy of matrix representation with parsimony analysis supertree construction.
    Bininda-Emonds OR; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2001 Aug; 50(4):565-79. PubMed ID: 12116654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The shape of supertrees to come: tree shape related properties of fourteen supertree methods.
    Wilkinson M; Cotton JA; Creevey C; Eulenstein O; Harris SR; Lapointe FJ; Levasseur C; McInerney JO; Pisani D; Thorley JL
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 16012108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Novel versus unsupported clades: assessing the qualitative support for clades in MRP supertrees.
    Bininda-Emonds OR
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 14668120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genus-level supertree of Cyprinidae (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes), partitioned qualitative clade support and test of macro-evolutionary scenarios.
    Gaubert P; Denys G; Oberdorff T
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2009 Nov; 84(4):653-89. PubMed ID: 19857213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A supertree pipeline for summarizing phylogenetic and taxonomic information for millions of species.
    Redelings BD; Holder MT
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3058. PubMed ID: 28265520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The Performance of Two Supertree Schemes Compared Using Synthetic and Real Data Quartet Input.
    Avni E; Yona Z; Cohen R; Snir S
    J Mol Evol; 2018 Feb; 86(2):150-165. PubMed ID: 29460038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improved heuristics for minimum-flip supertree construction.
    Chen D; Eulenstein O; Fernández-Baca D; Burleigh JG
    Evol Bioinform Online; 2007 Feb; 2():347-56. PubMed ID: 19455229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exact solutions for species tree inference from discordant gene trees.
    Chang WC; Górecki P; Eulenstein O
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 11(5):1342005. PubMed ID: 24131054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Amalgamating source trees with different taxonomic levels.
    Berry V; Bininda-Emonds OR; Semple C
    Syst Biol; 2013 Mar; 62(2):231-49. PubMed ID: 23179602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The impact of HGT on phylogenomic reconstruction methods.
    Lapierre P; Lasek-Nesselquist E; Gogarten JP
    Brief Bioinform; 2014 Jan; 15(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 22908214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. PhySIC: a veto supertree method with desirable properties.
    Ranwez V; Berry V; Criscuolo A; Fabre PH; Guillemot S; Scornavacca C; Douzery EJ
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):798-817. PubMed ID: 17918032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.