These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27376702)

  • 21. Indirect digital images: limit of image compression for diagnosis in endodontics.
    Siragusa M; McDonnell DJ
    Int Endod J; 2002 Dec; 35(12):991-5. PubMed ID: 12653317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of JPEG lossy image compression on quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 12076050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of a dental subtraction radiography system.
    Ellwood RP; Davies RM; Worthington HV
    J Periodontal Res; 1997 Feb; 32(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 9089491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of a novel digital subtraction technique for detecting subtle changes in jawbone density.
    Du Tré F; Jacobs R; Styven S; van Steenberghe D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Sep; 10(3):235-48. PubMed ID: 16770624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quantitative analysis of errors in alveolar crest level caused by discrepant projection geometry in digital subtraction radiography: an in vivo study.
    Huh KH; Lee SS; Jeon IS; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Dec; 100(6):750-5. PubMed ID: 16301158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of geometric distortion and exposure parameters on sensitivity of digital subtraction radiography.
    Rudolph DJ; White SC; Mankovich NJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Nov; 64(5):631-7. PubMed ID: 3313154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determination of the optimal conditions for dental subtraction radiography using a storage phosphor system.
    Brettle DS; Ellwood R; Davies R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10202471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of vertical root fractures in the presence of intracanal metallic post: a comparison between periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Junqueira RB; Verner FS; Campos CN; Devito KL; do Carmo AM
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1620-4. PubMed ID: 24238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of simulated periodontal bone defect depth measured in digital radiographs in dedicated and non-dedicated software systems.
    Scaf G; Sakakura CE; Kalil PF; Dearo de Morais JA; Loffredo LC; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 17082333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of automatic exposure control in a direct digital intraoral system.
    Benchimol D; Näsström K; Shi X
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 19700535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficacy of digital intra-oral radiography in clinical dentistry.
    Versteeg CH; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):215-24. PubMed ID: 9175348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of chronic periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography by using Adobe Photoshop CS: a technical report.
    Carvalho FB; Gonçalves M; Tanomaru-Filho M
    J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 17368347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vivo study of pixel grey-measurement in digital subtraction radiography for monitoring caries remineralization.
    Carneiro LS; Nunes CA; Silva MA; Leles CR; Mendonça EF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 19176648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Semiautomated image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Byrd V; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 9574960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A retrospective study of digital subtraction technique to detect sclerotic changes in alveolar bone on intraoral radiographs of bisphosphonate-treated patients.
    Zaman MU; Nakamoto T; Tanimoto K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130242. PubMed ID: 24170801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of a dental image analyzer tool to measure alveolar bone loss in periodontitis patients.
    Teeuw WJ; Coelho L; Silva A; van der Palen CJ; Lessmann FG; van der Velden U; Loos BG
    J Periodontal Res; 2009 Feb; 44(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18973543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the quality of temporal subtraction images obtained with manual and automated methods of digital chest radiography.
    Katsuragawa S; Tagashira H; Li Q; MacMahon H; Doi K
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 Nov; 12(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 10587911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automatic correspondence using the enhanced hexagonal centre-based inner search algorithm for point-based dental image registration.
    Economopoulos T; Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):185-204. PubMed ID: 18460572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of direct digital radiography system, filtered images, and subtraction radiography.
    Takeshita WM; Vessoni Iwaki LC; Da Silva MC; Filho LI; Queiroz Ade F; Geron LB
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2013 Jul; 4(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 24124300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.