These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27376949)

  • 1. Consent Issues in Genetic Research: Views of Research Participants.
    Goodman D; Johnson CO; Wenzel L; Bowen D; Condit C; Edwards KL
    Public Health Genomics; 2016; 19(4):220-8. PubMed ID: 27376949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Participant views on consent in cancer genetics research: preparing for the precision medicine era.
    Edwards KL; Korngiebel DM; Pfeifer L; Goodman D; Renz A; Wenzel L; Bowen DJ; Condit CM
    J Community Genet; 2016 Apr; 7(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 26801345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project.
    Zarate OA; Brody JG; Brown P; Ramirez-Andreotta MD; Perovich L; Matz J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 26678513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
    D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Participants' Role Expectations in Genetics Research and Re-consent: Revising the Theory and Methods of Mental Models Research Relating to Roles.
    Condit CM; Shen L; Edwards KL; Bowen DJ; Korngiebel DM; Johnson CO
    J Health Commun; 2016; 21(sup2):16-24. PubMed ID: 27653592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A qualitative study of participants' views on re-consent in a longitudinal biobank.
    Dixon-Woods M; Kocman D; Brewster L; Willars J; Laurie G; Tarrant C
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):22. PubMed ID: 28330487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the consent preferences of UK research volunteers for genetic and clinical studies.
    Kelly SE; Spector TD; Cherkas LF; Prainsack B; Harris JM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118027. PubMed ID: 25761107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sharing longitudinal, non-biological birth cohort data: a cross-sectional analysis of parent consent preferences.
    Manhas KP; Dodd SX; Page S; Letourneau N; Adair CE; Cui X; Tough SC
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Nov; 18(1):97. PubMed ID: 30419910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing.
    Robinson JO; Slashinski MJ; Wang T; Hilsenbeck SG; McGuire AL
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Oct; 8(4):42-52. PubMed ID: 24169421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "I passed the test!" Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa.
    Masiye F; Mayosi B; de Vries J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Feb; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 28202021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study.
    Kraft SA; Porter KM; Duenas DM; Guerra C; Joseph G; Lee SS; Shipman KJ; Allen J; Eubanks D; Kauffman TL; Lindberg NM; Anderson K; Zepp JM; Gilmore MJ; Mittendorf KF; Shuster E; Muessig KR; Arnold B; Goddard KAB; Wilfond BS
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 32981477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research.
    Platt J; Bollinger J; Dvoskin R; Kardia SL; Kaufman D
    Genet Med; 2014 Jan; 16(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 23660530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glad you asked: participants' opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission.
    Ludman EJ; Fullerton SM; Spangler L; Trinidad SB; Fujii MM; Jarvik GP; Larson EB; Burke W
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Sep; 5(3):9-16. PubMed ID: 20831417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care.
    Dickert NW; Wendler D; Devireddy CM; Goldkind SF; Ko YA; Speight CD; Kim SY
    Clin Trials; 2018 Dec; 15(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 30280582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants' Genomic Results.
    Edwards KL; Goodman D; Johnson CO; Wenzel L; Condit C; Bowen D
    Public Health Genomics; 2018; 21(1-2):18-26. PubMed ID: 30227419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understandings of genomic research in developing countries: a qualitative study of the views of MalariaGEN participants in Mali.
    Traore K; Bull S; Niare A; Konate S; Thera MA; Kwiatkowski D; Parker M; Doumbo OK
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Jun; 16():42. PubMed ID: 26077875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "It's for a good cause, isn't it?" - Exploring views of South African TB research participants on sample storage and re-use.
    van Schalkwyk G; de Vries J; Moodley K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2012 Jul; 13():19. PubMed ID: 22831568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of institutional review board professionals' and patients' views on consent for research on medical practices.
    Kraft SA; Cho MK; Constantine M; Lee SS; Kelley M; Korngiebel D; James C; Kuwana E; Meyer A; Porter K; Diekema D; Capron AM; Alicic R; Wilfond BS; Magnus D
    Clin Trials; 2016 Oct; 13(5):555-65. PubMed ID: 27257125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voluntary participation and comprehension of informed consent in a genetic epidemiological study of breast cancer in Nigeria.
    Marshall PA; Adebamowo CA; Adeyemo AA; Ogundiran TO; Strenski T; Zhou J; Rotimi CN
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 May; 15():38. PubMed ID: 24885380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lay public's understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials.
    Robinson EJ; Kerr CE; Stevens AJ; Lilford RJ; Braunholtz DA; Edwards SJ; Beck SR; Rowley MG
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(8):1-192, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 15763039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.