BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27377075)

  • 1. Contact-force-guided vs. contact-force-blinded catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter: a prospective study.
    Venier S; Andrade JG; Khairy P; Mondésert B; Dyrda K; Rivard L; Guerra PG; Dubuc M; Thibault B; Talajic M; Roy D; Macle L
    Europace; 2017 Jun; 19(6):1043-1048. PubMed ID: 27377075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High Incidence of Low Catheter-Tissue Contact Force at the Cavotricuspid Isthmus During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Flutter: Implications for Achieving Isthmus Block.
    Kumar S; Morton JB; Lee G; Halloran K; Kistler PM; Kalman JM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 26(8):826-831. PubMed ID: 25952766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation for Atrial Flutter Guided by Novel Parameters Using a Contact Force Catheter.
    Gould PA; Booth C; Dauber K; Ng K; Claughton A; Kaye GC
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1429-1436. PubMed ID: 27569722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cavotricuspid isthmus ablation using ablation index in typical right atrial flutter.
    Zhang T; Wang Y; Han Z; Zhao H; Liang Z; Wang Y; Wu Y; Ren X
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Nov; 30(11):2414-2419. PubMed ID: 31502295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gold-tip versus contact-sensing catheter for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: A comparative study.
    Gül EE; Boles U; Haseeb S; Hopman WM; Chacko S; Simpson C; Abdollah H; Michael K; Baranchuk A; Redfearn D; Glover B
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2018 Sep; 46(6):464-470. PubMed ID: 30204137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized controlled trial of Amigo® robotically controlled versus manually controlled ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus using a contact force ablation catheter.
    Hoffmayer KS; Krainski F; Shah S; Hunter J; Alegre M; Hsu JC; Feld GK
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2018 Mar; 51(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29435790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized trial of contact force in atrial flutter ablation.
    Giehm-Reese M; Kronborg MB; Lukac P; Kristiansen SB; Jensen HK; Gerdes C; Kristensen J; Nielsen JM; Nielsen JC
    Europace; 2020 Jun; 22(6):947-955. PubMed ID: 32298418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First clinical experience of a dedicated irrigated-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter for the ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter.
    Knecht S; Burch F; Reichlin T; Spies F; Mühl A; Altmann D; Ammann P; Schaer B; Osswald S; Sticherling C; Kühne M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):281-286. PubMed ID: 29204691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Catheter navigation by intracardiac echocardiography enables zero-fluoroscopy linear lesion formation and bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block in patients with typical atrial flutter.
    Luani B; Basho M; Ismail A; Rauwolf T; Kaese S; Tobli N; Samol A; Pankraz K; Schmeisser A; Wiemer M; Braun-Dullaeus RC; Genz C
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2023 Aug; 21(1):13. PubMed ID: 37537565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new methodology for atrial flutter ablation by direct visualization of cavotricuspid conduction with voltage gradient mapping: a comparison to standard techniques.
    Bailin SJ; Johnson WB; Jumrussirikul P; Sorentino D; West R
    Europace; 2013 Jul; 15(7):1013-8. PubMed ID: 23447574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicentre randomised trial comparing contact force with electrical coupling index in atrial flutter ablation (VERISMART trial).
    Begg GA; O'Neill J; Sohaib A; McLean A; Pepper CB; Graham LN; Hogarth AJ; Page SP; Gillott RG; Hill N; Walshaw J; Schilling RJ; Kanagaratnam P; Tayebjee MH
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0212903. PubMed ID: 30943196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ablation of typical atrial flutter: a prospective study of cooled-tip versus 8-mm-tip catheters.
    Iori M; Bottoni N; Quartieri F; Sassone B; Guerzoni S
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2014 Jun; 62(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 24831764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cryothermal vs. radiofrequency ablation as atrial flutter therapy: a randomized comparison.
    Bastani H; Drca N; Insulander P; Schwieler J; Braunschweig F; Kennebäck G; Sadigh B; Tapanainen J; Jensen-Urstad M
    Europace; 2013 Mar; 15(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 22927662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus morphology in CRYO versus radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter.
    Saygi S; Bastani H; Drca N; Insulander P; Wredlert C; Schwieler J; Jensen-Urstad M
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Apr; 51(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 27826985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility and efficacy of simultaneous pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation using cryotherapy.
    Dhillon PS; Domenichini G; Gonna H; Bastiaenen R; Norman M; Gallagher MM
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):714-8. PubMed ID: 24641352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The benefit of tissue contact monitoring with an electrical coupling index during ablation of typical atrial flutter--a prospective randomised control trial.
    Jones MA; Webster D; Wong KC; Hayes C; Qureshi N; Rajappan K; Bashir Y; Betts TR
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2014 Dec; 41(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 25234603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of acute inefficacy and the radiofrequency energy time required for cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter ablation.
    Pérez-Rodon J; Rodriguez-García J; Sarrias-Merce A; Rivas-Gandara N; Roca-Luque I; Francisco-Pascual J; Santos-Ortega A; Martín-Sánchez G; Ferreira-González I; Rodríguez-Palomares J; Evangelista-Masip A; García-Dorado D; Moya-Mitjans À
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Jun; 49(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 28265782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized comparison of the continuous vs point-by-point radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for atrial flutter.
    Miyazaki S; Takahashi A; Kuwahara T; Kobori A; Yokoyama Y; Nozato T; Sato A; Aonuma K; Hirao K; Isobe M
    Circ J; 2007 Dec; 71(12):1922-6. PubMed ID: 18037747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomized comparison of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for atrial flutter using an open irrigation-tip versus a large-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter.
    Ilg KJ; Kühne M; Crawford T; Chugh A; Jongnarangsin K; Good E; Pelosi F; Bogun F; Morady F; Oral H
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1007-12. PubMed ID: 21453368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safety, efficacy, and reproducibility of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation guided by the ablation index: acute results of the FLAI study.
    Viola G; Stabile G; Bandino S; Rossi L; Marrazzo N; Pecora D; Bottoni N; Solimene F; Schillaci V; Scaglione M; Ocello S; Baiocchi C; Santoro A; Donzelli S; De Ruvo E; Lavalle C; Sanchez-Gomez JM; Pastor JFA; Grandio PC; Ferraris F; Castro A; Rebellato L; Marchese P; Adao L; Primo J; Barra S; Casu G
    Europace; 2021 Feb; 23(2):264-270. PubMed ID: 33212484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.