BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27377435)

  • 1. Objective and perceptual comparisons of two bluetooth hearing aid assistive devices.
    Clark JL; Pustejovsky C; Vanneste S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Aug; 12(6):614-617. PubMed ID: 27377435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of a Bluetooth-implemented hearing aid on speech recognition performance: subjective and objective measurement.
    Kim MB; Chung WH; Choi J; Hong SH; Cho YS; Park G; Lee S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 24687593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective.
    Cox RM; Johnson JA; Xu J
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e224-37. PubMed ID: 26881981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An internet survey of individuals with hearing loss regarding assistive listening devices.
    Harkins J; Tucker P
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Jun; 11(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 17494875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Benefits of Compression Amplification in Telephone Bluetooth-Assistive Listening Devices for People with Hearing Loss.
    Luo CH; Chang HY; Lo TS; Tai CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30461395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal-to-noise.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):528-41. PubMed ID: 22031677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for the use of hearing assistive technology by adults: the role of the FM system.
    Chisolm TH; Noe CM; McArdle R; Abrams H
    Trends Amplif; 2007 Jun; 11(2):73-89. PubMed ID: 17494874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of assistive listening device and digital wireless technology for hearing instruments.
    Kim JS; Kim CH
    Korean J Audiol; 2014 Dec; 18(3):105-11. PubMed ID: 25566400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of wireless Bluetooth devices to improve recognition of speech and sentences when using a mobile phone in bone conduction device recipients.
    Kong TH; Kwak C; Han W; Seo YJ
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Oct; 276(10):2729-2737. PubMed ID: 31218446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative enhancement of speech in noise through a wireless equipped hearing aid.
    Ciorba A; Zattara S; Loroni G; Prosser S
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2014 Feb; 34(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 24711683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The benefits of using bluetooth accessories with hearing aids.
    Smith P; Davis A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Oct; 53(10):770-3. PubMed ID: 25158607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Communicating with assistive listening devices and age-related hearing loss: Perceptions of older Australians.
    Aberdeen L; Fereiro D
    Contemp Nurse; 2014; 47(1-2):119-31. PubMed ID: 25267134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.