These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2737967)

  • 21. Cochlear tuning in the gerbil: a comparison of responses to sinusoidal amplitude modulation and difference tone stimuli.
    Henry KR
    Audiology; 1998; 37(5):262-77. PubMed ID: 9776203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Response of cochlear nerve fibers to brief acoustic stimuli: role of discharge-history effects.
    Gaumond RP; Kim DO; Molnar CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Nov; 74(5):1392-8. PubMed ID: 6643851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Enhancement of the cochlear nerve compound action potential: sharply defined frequency-intensity domains bordering the tuning curve.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1991 Nov; 56(1-2):239-45. PubMed ID: 1769917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. One-tone suppression in the cochlear nerve of the gerbil.
    Henry KR; Lewis ER
    Hear Res; 1992 Nov; 63(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 1464563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. II. Single- and two-tone intensity functions in relation to tuning curves.
    Schmiedt RA; Zwislocki JJ
    J Neurophysiol; 1980 May; 43(5):1390-405. PubMed ID: 7373369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators.
    Verhey JL; Ewert SD; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2135-46. PubMed ID: 14587611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical and receiver operating characteristic analysis of empirical spike-count distributions: quantifying the ability of cochlear nucleus units to signal intensity changes.
    Shofner WP; Dye RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2172-84. PubMed ID: 2600308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Forward masking in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body of the rat.
    Gao F; Berrebi AS
    Brain Struct Funct; 2016 May; 221(4):2303-17. PubMed ID: 25921974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers.
    Delgutte B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Feb; 87(2):791-809. PubMed ID: 2307776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Offset tuning curves generated by simultaneous masking are more finely tuned than those generated by forward masking.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1986; 24(2):151-61. PubMed ID: 3771377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modulation of cochlear nerve spike rate by cardiac activity in the gerbil.
    Lewis ER; Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1992 Nov; 63(1-2):7-11. PubMed ID: 1464576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modulation of cochlear tuning by low-frequency sound.
    Klis JF; Prijs VF; Latour JB; Smoorenburg GF
    Hear Res; 1988 Nov; 36(2-3):163-73. PubMed ID: 3209489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Responses of single cells in the cat inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference signals.
    Caird D; Pillmann F; Klinke R
    Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 43(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 2613563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustically derived auditory nerve action potential evoked by electrical stimulation: an estimation of the waveform of single unit contribution.
    de Sauvage RC; Cazals Y; Erre JP; Aran JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):616-27. PubMed ID: 6841801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Latency enhancement of the cochlear nerve compound action potential (CAP).
    Price JM; Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1992 Nov; 63(1-2):97-101. PubMed ID: 1464580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tuning and timing in the gerbil ear: Wiener-kernel analysis.
    Lewis ER; Henry KR; Yamada WM
    Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 174(1-2):206-21. PubMed ID: 12433411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory brainstem response latency in forward masking, a marker of sensory deficits in listeners with normal hearing thresholds.
    Mehraei G; Gallardo AP; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Dau T
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 346():34-44. PubMed ID: 28159652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neural mechanisms of tone-on-tone masking: patterns of discharge rate and discharge synchrony related to rates of spontaneous discharge in the chinchilla auditory nerve.
    Sinex DG; Havey DC
    J Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 56(6):1763-80. PubMed ID: 3806187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.