These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27379723)

  • 1. Dental Implant Length and Diameter: A Proposed Classification Scheme.
    Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Alsaeed S; Alalola B
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Apr; 26(3):252-260. PubMed ID: 27379723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta-analysis based on prospective clinical trials.
    Ortega-Oller I; Suárez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Torrecillas-Martínez L; Monje A; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2014 Apr; 85(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 23905841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Terminology for implant prostheses.
    Simon H; Yanase RT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 12939005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates.
    Renouard F; Nisand D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():35-51. PubMed ID: 16968380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure.
    Olate S; Lyrio MC; de Moraes M; Mazzonetto R; Moreira RW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):414-9. PubMed ID: 20116716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prosthodontic considerations designed to optimize outcomes for single-tooth implants. A review of the literature.
    Lewis MB; Klineberg I
    Aust Dent J; 2011 Jun; 56(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 21623811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Proposal of New Classification for Dental Implant Complications.
    Turkyilmaz I
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1025-1033. PubMed ID: 30150507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do implant length and width matter for short dental implants (<10 mm)? A meta-analysis of prospective studies.
    Monje A; Fu JH; Chan HL; Suarez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2013 Dec; 84(12):1783-91. PubMed ID: 23451988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comprehensive and critical review of dental implant prognosis in periodontally compromised partially edentulous patients.
    Karoussis IK; Kotsovilis S; Fourmousis I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):669-79. PubMed ID: 17868376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant-prosthodontic classification of the edentulous jaw for treatment planning with fixed rehabilitations.
    Papadimitriou DE; Salari S; Gannam C; Gallucci GO; Friedland B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 25010874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review.
    Sohrabi K; Mushantat A; Esfandiari S; Feine J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 22313216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-Term Follow-Up of 2.5-mm Narrow-Diameter Implants Supporting a Fixed Prostheses.
    Anitua E; Saracho J; Begoña L; Alkhraisat MH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 18(4):769-77. PubMed ID: 25913652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Length, Diameter, or Bone Quality Affect Primary and Secondary Stability in Self-Tapping Dental Implants?
    Gómez-Polo M; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Martín C; Celemín A; Del Río J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 74(7):1344-53. PubMed ID: 27070843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biologic width around implants. An evidence-based review.
    Linkevicius T; Apse P
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 18493163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stability and marginal bone loss with three types of early loaded implants during the first year after loading.
    Liaje A; Ozkan YK; Ozkan Y; Vanlioğlu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):162-72. PubMed ID: 22299093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term survival of calcium phosphate-coated dental implants: a meta-analytical approach to the clinical literature.
    van Oirschot BA; Bronkhorst EM; van den Beucken JJ; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA; Junker R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Apr; 24(4):355-62. PubMed ID: 23126337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Pommer B; Frantal S; Willer J; Posch M; Watzek G; Tepper G
    J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Sep; 38(9):856-63. PubMed ID: 21722154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter.
    Winkler S; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 11885179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of narrow- vs. regular-diameter dental implants: a 3-year follow-up. A retrospective study.
    Zweers J; van Doornik A; Hogendorf EA; Quirynen M; Van der Weijden GA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Feb; 26(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 24372952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant diameter and length influence on survival: interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer.
    Mijiritsky E; Mazor Z; Lorean A; Levin L
    Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 23811719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.