545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27379821)
1. Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.
Choy B; Pearce SM; Anderson BB; Shalhav AL; Zagaja G; Eggener SE; Paner GP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Oct; 40(10):1400-6. PubMed ID: 27379821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive value of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology grading system for prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with long-term follow-up.
Grogan J; Gupta R; Mahon KL; Stricker PD; Haynes AM; Delprado W; Turner J; Horvath LG; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2017 Nov; 120(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 28371244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.
Berg KD; Thomsen FB; Nerstrøm C; Røder MA; Iversen P; Toft BG; Vainer B; Brasso K
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):883-9. PubMed ID: 26823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic impact of intraductal carcinoma and large cribriform carcinoma architecture after prostatectomy in a contemporary cohort.
Trudel D; Downes MR; Sykes J; Kron KJ; Trachtenberg J; van der Kwast TH
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jun; 50(9):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24703897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer outcomes of men with biopsy Gleason score 6 and 7 without cribriform or intraductal carcinoma.
Kweldam CF; Kümmerlin IP; Nieboer D; Verhoef EI; Steyerberg EW; Incrocci L; Bangma CH; van der Kwast TH; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJ
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Oct; 66():26-33. PubMed ID: 27522247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New Prostate Cancer Grading System Predicts Long-term Survival Following Surgery for Gleason Score 8-10 Prostate Cancer.
Ham WS; Chalfin HJ; Feng Z; Trock BJ; Epstein JI; Cheung C; Humphreys E; Partin AW; Han M
Eur Urol; 2017 Jun; 71(6):907-912. PubMed ID: 27876305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinicopathological characteristics of glomeruloid architecture in prostate cancer.
Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Osanto S; Pelger RCM; van Wezel T; van der Poel H; Bekers E; Helleman J; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
Mod Pathol; 2020 Aug; 33(8):1618-1625. PubMed ID: 32080350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognostic implications of 2005 Gleason grade modification. Population-based study of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Thomsen FB; Folkvaljon Y; Brasso K; Loeb S; Robinson D; Egevad L; Stattin P
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Nov; 114(6):664-670. PubMed ID: 27511833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Expansile Cribriform and Other Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer Subtypes.
Chappidi MR; Sjöström M; Greenland NY; Cowan JE; Baskin AS; Shee K; Simko JP; Chan E; Stohr BA; Washington SL; Nguyen HG; Quigley DA; Davicioni E; Feng FY; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Apr; 7(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 37474400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Shikanov S; Marchetti P; Desai V; Razmaria A; Antic T; Al-Ahmadie H; Zagaja G; Eggener S; Brendler C; Shalhav A
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 22759270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significance of the cribriform morphology area ratio for biochemical recurrence in Gleason score 4 + 4 prostate cancer patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Shimodaira K; Inoue R; Hashimoto T; Satake N; Shishido T; Namiki K; Harada K; Nagao T; Ohno Y
Cancer Med; 2024 Mar; 13(5):e7086. PubMed ID: 38477506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of architectural subtypes of Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy: A semiquantitative method of evaluation.
da Paz AR; Billis A; Freitas LLL; Costa LBE; Barreto IS; Magna LA; Matheus WE; Ferreira U
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Feb; 50():151678. PubMed ID: 33341702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.
Takeuchi N; Sakamoto S; Nishiyama A; Horikoshi T; Yamada Y; Iizuka J; Maimaiti M; Imamura Y; Kawamura K; Imamoto T; Komiya A; Ikehara Y; Akakura K; Ichikawa T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):e817-e829. PubMed ID: 29576444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.
Flood TA; Schieda N; Keefe DT; Breau RH; Morash C; Hogan K; Belanger EC; Mai KT; Robertson SJ
Virchows Arch; 2016 Sep; 469(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 27394432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative influence of cribriform growth and percent Gleason 4 in prostatic biopsies with Gleason 3+4 cancer.
Czaja RC; Tarima S; Wu R; Palagnmonthip W; Iczkowski KA
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Jun; 52():151725. PubMed ID: 33610958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
