These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27380049)
21. Comparison of the LMA Supreme™ with the LMA Proseal™ for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position. López AM; Valero R; Hurtado P; Gambús P; Pons M; Anglada T Br J Anaesth; 2011 Aug; 107(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 21576096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The laryngeal mask airway Unique versus the Soft Seal laryngeal mask: a randomized, crossover study in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Brimacombe J; von Goedecke A; Keller C; Brimacombe L; Brimacombe M Anesth Analg; 2004 Nov; 99(5):1560-1563. PubMed ID: 15502065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Appropriate size of laryngeal mask airway for children. Loke GP; Tan SM; Ng AS Anaesth Intensive Care; 2002 Dec; 30(6):771-4. PubMed ID: 12500516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. LMA Supreme™ and Ambu® AuraGain™ in anesthetized adult patients: a prospective observational study. Kriege M; Piepho T; Zanker S; Alflen C; Heid F; Noppens RR Minerva Anestesiol; 2017 Feb; 83(2):165-174. PubMed ID: 27676414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal. Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of ProSeal LMA with Supreme LMA in paediatric patients. Hoşten T; Gürkan Y; Kuş A; Özdamar D; Aksu C; Solak M; Toker K Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Sep; 57(8):996-1001. PubMed ID: 23809021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A cohort evaluation of the laryngeal mask airway-Supreme™ in children. Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Chang E; Sawardekar A Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):759-64. PubMed ID: 22416790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of clinical performance of size 1.5 Supreme™ LMA and Proseal™ LMA among Asian children: a randomized controlled trial. Chaw SH; Shariffuddin II; Foo LL; Lee PK; Paran RM; Cheang PC; Chan L J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1093-1099. PubMed ID: 29404890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial. Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Size 1 ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, noncrossover study with the Classic™ laryngeal mask airway. López-Gil M; Mantilla I; Blanco T; Teigell E; Hervias M; Fernández-López R Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Apr; 22(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 22295870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Brief review: The LMA Supreme™ supraglottic airway. Wong DT; Yang JJ; Jagannathan N Can J Anaesth; 2012 May; 59(5):483-93. PubMed ID: 22318376 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in Different Head and Neck Positions in Spontaneously Breathing Pediatric Population. Gupta S; Dogra N; Chauhan K Anesth Essays Res; 2017; 11(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 28928564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Size 2 LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Supreme™ in Spontaneously Breathing Children: a Randomised Clinical Trial. Arslan Zİ; Balcı C; Oysu DA; Yılmaz M; Gürbüz N; Ilce Z Balkan Med J; 2013 Mar; 30(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 25207076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion. Kim GW; Kim JY; Kim SJ; Moon YR; Park EJ; Park SY BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30611202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A randomised comparison of the self-pressurised air-QTM intubating laryngeal airway with the LMA Unique™ in children. Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Shah R; Ryan K; Jagannathan R; Anderson K Anaesthesia; 2012 Sep; 67(9):973-9. PubMed ID: 22670827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks. Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fiber-optic assessment of LMA position in children: a randomized crossover comparison of two techniques. Ghai B; Ram J; Makkar JK; Wig J Paediatr Anaesth; 2011 Nov; 21(11):1142-7. PubMed ID: 21689206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The LMA-Supreme versus the I-gel in simulated difficult airway in children: a randomised study. Kus A; Gok CN; Hosten T; Gurkan Y; Solak M; Toker K Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 May; 31(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 24632572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A randomized comparison of pediatric-sized Streamlined Liner of Pharyngeal Airway and Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique in paralyzed children. Zhu W; Wei X Paediatr Anaesth; 2016 May; 26(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 27012370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]