93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27381010)
1. Participants' Accounts on Their Decision to Join a Cohort Study With an Attached Biobank: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study Within Two German Studies.
Nobile H; Bergmann MM; Moldenhauer J; Borry P
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Jul; 11(3):237-49. PubMed ID: 27381010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A qualitative study of participants' views on re-consent in a longitudinal biobank.
Dixon-Woods M; Kocman D; Brewster L; Willars J; Laurie G; Tarrant C
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):22. PubMed ID: 28330487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Participants' decision to enroll in cohort studies with biobanks: quantitative insights from two German studies.
Nobile H; Borry P; Pischon T; Steinbrecher A; Boeing H; Vigl M; Bergmann MM
Per Med; 2017 Nov; 14(6):477-485. PubMed ID: 29749857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies.
Hobbs A; Starkbaum J; Gottweis U; Wichmann HE; Gottweis H
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):272-84. PubMed ID: 22722691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.
Allen J; McNamara B
Bioethics; 2011 Mar; 25(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 19659851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "In the physio we trust": A qualitative study on patients' preferences for physiotherapy.
Bernhardsson S; Larsson MEH; Johansson K; Öberg B
Physiother Theory Pract; 2017 Jul; 33(7):535-549. PubMed ID: 28590787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adequate trust avails, mistaken trust matters: on the moral responsibility of doctors as proxies for patients' trust in biobank research.
Johnsson L; Helgesson G; Hansson MG; Eriksson S
Bioethics; 2013 Nov; 27(9):485-92. PubMed ID: 22681564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank.
Broekstra R; Maeckelberghe ELM; Aris-Meijer JL; Stolk RP; Otten S
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 32711531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Participation in environmental health research by placenta donation - a perception study.
Lind U; Mose T; Knudsen LE
Environ Health; 2007 Nov; 6():36. PubMed ID: 18034882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biobank Participants' Attitudes Toward Data Sharing and Privacy: The Role of Trust in Reducing Perceived Risks.
Kasperbauer TJ; Halverson C; Garcia A; Schwartz PH
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022; 17(1-2):167-176. PubMed ID: 34779299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Allocation of Resources to Communication of Research Result Summaries.
Richards JE; Bane E; Fullerton SM; Ludman EJ; Jarvik G
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Oct; 11(4):364-369. PubMed ID: 27613778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Personalized assent for pediatric biobanks.
Giesbertz NA; Melham K; Kaye J; van Delden JJ; Bredenoord AL
BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):59. PubMed ID: 27733160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research.
Halverson CM; Ross LF
Genet Med; 2012 Jun; 14(6):611-5. PubMed ID: 22261760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adding dynamic consent to a longitudinal cohort study: A qualitative study of EXCEED participant perspectives.
Wallace SE; Miola J
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Feb; 22(1):12. PubMed ID: 33563268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Listening to the voices of the general public in India on biomedical research--an exploratory study.
Vaz M; Vaz M; Srinivasan K
Indian J Med Ethics; 2015; 12(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 25920970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository: A Qualitative Analysis.
Broekstra R; Aris-Meijer J; Maeckelberghe E; Stolk R; Otten S
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):365-378. PubMed ID: 31738093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent, biobank research, and locality: perceptions of breast cancer patients in three European countries.
Petersen I; Desmedt C; Harris A; Buffa F; Kollek R
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 25746784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination.
Purvis RS; Abraham TH; Long CR; Stewart MK; Warmack TS; McElfish PA
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 28949841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why do - or don't - patients with urinary tract infection participate in a clinical trial? A qualitative study in German family medicine.
Bleidorn J; Bucak S; Gágyor I; Hummers-Pradier E; Dierks ML
Ger Med Sci; 2015; 13():Doc17. PubMed ID: 26512232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
