154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27381486)
1. Accounting for multimorbidity in pay for performance: a modelling study using UK Quality and Outcomes Framework data.
Ruscitto A; Mercer SW; Morales D; Guthrie B
Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Aug; 66(649):e561-7. PubMed ID: 27381486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: impact of implementing government proposals.
Caley M; Burn S; Marshall T; Rouse A
Br J Gen Pract; 2014 Jan; 64(618):e54-9. PubMed ID: 24567583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.
Scott A; Sivey P; Ait Ouakrim D; Willenberg L; Naccarella L; Furler J; Young D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD008451. PubMed ID: 21901722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS.
Walker S; Mason AR; Claxton K; Cookson R; Fenwick E; Fleetcroft R; Sculpher M
Br J Gen Pract; 2010 May; 60(574):e213-20. PubMed ID: 20423576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incentive payments are not related to expected health gain in the pay for performance scheme for UK primary care: cross-sectional analysis.
Fleetcroft R; Steel N; Cookson R; Walker S; Howe A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Apr; 12():94. PubMed ID: 22507660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Withdrawing performance indicators: retrospective analysis of general practice performance under UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Kontopantelis E; Springate D; Reeves D; Ashcroft DM; Valderas JM; Doran T
BMJ; 2014 Jan; 348():g330. PubMed ID: 24468469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Mind the gap!" Evaluation of the performance gap attributable to exception reporting and target thresholds in the new GMS contract: National database analysis.
Fleetcroft R; Steel N; Cookson R; Howe A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jun; 8():131. PubMed ID: 18559086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care.
Peterson GM; Russell G; Radford JC; Zwar N; Mazza D; Eckermann S; Mullan J; Batterham MJ; Hammond A; Bonney A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Jul; 19(1):529. PubMed ID: 31357999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of clinical primary care and targeted incentive payments: an observational study.
Steel N; Maisey S; Clark A; Fleetcroft R; Howe A
Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Jun; 57(539):449-54. PubMed ID: 17550669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The UK pay-for-performance programme in primary care: estimation of population mortality reduction.
Fleetcroft R; Parekh-Bhurke S; Howe A; Cookson R; Swift L; Steel N
Br J Gen Pract; 2010 Sep; 60(578):e345-52. PubMed ID: 20849684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of financial incentives for case finding for depression in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease: interrupted time series analysis.
McLintock K; Russell AM; Alderson SL; West R; House A; Westerman K; Foy R
BMJ Open; 2014 Aug; 4(8):e005178. PubMed ID: 25142262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can Pay-for Performance Incentive Levels be Determined Using a Cost-Effectiveness Framework?
Pandya A; Soeteman DI; Gupta A; Kamel H; Mushlin AI; Rosenthal MB
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2020 Jul; 13(7):e006492. PubMed ID: 32615799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. General practice funding underpins the persistence of the inverse care law: cross-sectional study in Scotland.
McLean G; Guthrie B; Mercer SW; Watt GC
Br J Gen Pract; 2015 Dec; 65(641):e799-805. PubMed ID: 26622032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of financial incentives on incentivised and non-incentivised clinical activities: longitudinal analysis of data from the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Doran T; Kontopantelis E; Valderas JM; Campbell S; Roland M; Salisbury C; Reeves D
BMJ; 2011 Jun; 342():d3590. PubMed ID: 21712336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimated impact from the withdrawal of primary care financial incentives on selected indicators of quality of care in Scotland: controlled interrupted time series analysis.
Morales DR; Minchin M; Kontopantelis E; Roland M; Sutton M; Guthrie B
BMJ; 2023 Mar; 380():e072098. PubMed ID: 36948515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exempting dissenting patients from pay for performance schemes: retrospective analysis of exception reporting in the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework.
Doran T; Kontopantelis E; Fullwood C; Lester H; Valderas JM; Campbell S
BMJ; 2012 Apr; 344():e2405. PubMed ID: 22511209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Record rewards: the effects of targeted quality incentives on the recording of risk factors by primary care providers.
Sutton M; Elder R; Guthrie B; Watt G
Health Econ; 2010 Jan; 19(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19206084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Details matter: Physician responses to multiple payments for the same activity.
Feng Y; Gravelle H
Soc Sci Med; 2019 Aug; 235():112343. PubMed ID: 31325900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Population health needs as predictors of variations in NHS practice payments: a cross-sectional study of English general practices in 2013-2014 and 2014-2015.
Levene LS; Baker R; Wilson A; Walker N; Boomla K; Bankart MJ
Br J Gen Pract; 2017 Jan; 67(654):e10-e19. PubMed ID: 27872085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of a pay-for-performance program in primary care designed by target users.
Kirschner K; Braspenning J; Akkermans RP; Jacobs JE; Grol R
Fam Pract; 2013 Apr; 30(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 22997223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]