126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2738165)
1. Morphometric diagnosis of serous effusions: refinement of differences between benign and malignant cases by use of outlying values and larger sample size.
Scott N; Sutton J; Gray C
J Clin Pathol; 1989 Jun; 42(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 2738165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Morphometric differences between cytologically benign and malignant serous effusions.
Gavin FM; Gray C; Sutton J; Clayden AD; Banks RI; Bird CC
Acta Cytol; 1988; 32(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 2450434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic approach of effusion cytology using computerized image analysis.
Athanassiadou P; Kavantzas N; Davaris P; Gonidi M; Liossi A; Nakopoulou L; Petrakakou E; Athanassiades P
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Mar; 21(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 12071529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of computerized morphometric analysis in diagnosis of effusion specimens.
Arora B; Setia S; Rekhi B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Oct; 34(10):670-5. PubMed ID: 16955473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of DNA flow cytometry and image cytometry on effusion fluid.
Saha I; Dey P; Vhora H; Nijhawan R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2000 Feb; 22(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 10649516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nuclear and cell area measurements in the cytological evaluation of pleural effusions: a study of subjective assessments and morphometric measurements.
Christensen JA; Skaarland E
Diagn Cytopathol; 1987 Mar; 3(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 3568972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of cytology in diagnosis of serous effusions in malignant lymphomas: An experience of a tertiary care center.
Patel T; Patel P; Mehta S; Shah M; Jetly D; Khanna N
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Aug; 47(8):776-782. PubMed ID: 31091023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic utility of GLUT-1 expression in the cytologic evaluation of serous fluids.
Afify A; Zhou H; Howell L; Paulino AF
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 16450901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Positive effusion cytology as the initial presentation of malignancy.
Monte SA; Ehya H; Lang WR
Acta Cytol; 1987; 31(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 3604540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cytologic application of carcinoembryonic antigen for the discrimination of malignant from benign serous effusions.
Kyrkou KA; Iatridis SG; Athanassiadou PP; Athanassiadis PP; Mandragos CE
Cancer Detect Prev; 1985; 8(1-2):247-54. PubMed ID: 4064045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interphase nucleolar organizer regions in the evaluation of serosal cavity effusions.
Carrillo R; Sneige N; el-Naggar AK
Acta Cytol; 1994; 38(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 8191825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An immunoperoxidase study of S-100 protein in neoplastic cells in serous effusions. Use as a marker for melanoma.
Pinto MM
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 3521174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of pericellular lacunae in cell blocks of effusions.
Price BA; Ehya H; Lee JH
Acta Cytol; 1992; 36(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 1580117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytological diagnosis of serous effusions in a cancer hospital in Brazil.
Oyafuso MS; Longatto Filho A; Bortolan J; Rahal P; Bisi H; Lombardo V
Pathologica; 1996 Apr; 88(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 8927447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pericellular lacunae in effusions.
McNeely TB
Diagn Cytopathol; 1993 Oct; 9(5):503-7. PubMed ID: 8287756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pericellular lacunae in the diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma in effusions: is this a useful sign?
Thomson T; Hayes MM
Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Sep; 15(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 8955600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of cytologic examination with ELISA assays for hyaluronan and soluble CD44v6 levels in evaluation of effusions.
Afify A; Lynne LC; Howell L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Feb; 35(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 17230576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Contribution of immunocytochemical marking of benign cells to the diagnosis of serous effusions].
Gaulier A; Cava E; Chosia MC; Pore G; Marsan C
Ann Pathol; 1986; 6(4-5):323-8. PubMed ID: 3814272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of serous effusions and peritoneal washings: comparison with immunocytochemistry and morphological findings.
Risberg B; Davidson B; Dong HP; Nesland JM; Berner A
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jul; 53(7):513-7. PubMed ID: 10961174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cellular morphometry in nongynecologic thin-layer and filter cytologic specimens.
Bishop JW; Sims KL
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1998 Aug; 20(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 9739408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
