125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27381786)
1. Incentives and participation in a medical survey.
Gjøstein DK; Huitfeldt A; Løberg M; Adami HO; Garborg K; Kalager M; Bretthauer M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2016 Jul; 136(12-13):1082-7. PubMed ID: 27381786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lottery ticket was more effective than a prize draw in increasing questionnaire response among cancer survivors.
Drummond FJ; O'Leary E; Sharp L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):769-75. PubMed ID: 25704725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Financial disincentives? A three-armed randomised controlled trial of the effect of financial Incentives in Diabetic Eye Assessment by Screening (IDEAS) trial.
Judah G; Darzi A; Vlaev I; Gunn L; King D; King D; Valabhji J; Bicknell C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 102(8):1014-1020. PubMed ID: 29793929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What impact do questionnaire length and monetary incentives have on mailed health psychology survey response?
Robb KA; Gatting L; Wardle J
Br J Health Psychol; 2017 Nov; 22(4):671-685. PubMed ID: 28422369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on response of including a lottery incentive in health surveys [ISRCTN32203485].
Roberts LM; Wilson S; Roalfe A; Bridge P
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Nov; 4(1):30. PubMed ID: 15533256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving response rate and quality of survey data with a scratch lottery ticket incentive.
Olsen F; Abelsen B; Olsen JA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():52. PubMed ID: 22515335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey.
Perneger TV; Etter JF; Rougemont A
Am J Epidemiol; 1993 Nov; 138(9):714-22. PubMed ID: 8237986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increasing response rates to follow-up questionnaires in health intervention research: Randomized controlled trial of a gift card prize incentive.
Morgan AJ; Rapee RM; Bayer JK
Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):381-386. PubMed ID: 28393632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Face-to-face vs telephone pre-colonoscopy consultation in colorectal cancer screening; a randomised trial.
Stoop EM; de Wijkerslooth TR; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; van Leerdam ME
Br J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 107(7):1051-8. PubMed ID: 22918392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do incentives, reminders or reduced burden improve healthcare professional response rates in postal questionnaires? two randomised controlled trials.
Glidewell L; Thomas R; MacLennan G; Bonetti D; Johnston M; Eccles MP; Edlin R; Pitts NB; Clarkson J; Steen N; Grimshaw JM
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Aug; 12():250. PubMed ID: 22891875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts.
Spry VM; Hovell MF; Sallis JG; Hofsteter CR; Elder JP; Molgaard CA
Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Jul; 130(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 2741903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
Stoop EM; de Haan MC; de Wijkerslooth TR; Bossuyt PM; van Ballegooijen M; Nio CY; van de Vijver MJ; Biermann K; Thomeer M; van Leerdam ME; Fockens P; Stoker J; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E
Lancet Oncol; 2012 Jan; 13(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 22088831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of pre-notification, invitation length, questionnaire length and reminder on participation rate: a quasi-randomised controlled trial.
Koitsalu M; Eklund M; Adolfsson J; Grönberg H; Brandberg Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):3. PubMed ID: 29304734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of prize draw incentive on the response rate to a postal survey of obstetricians and gynaecologists: a randomised controlled trial. [ISRCTN32823119].
Moses SH; Clark TJ
BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Jun; 4(1):14. PubMed ID: 15222889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increasing health examination survey participation rates by SMS reminders and flexible examination times.
Tolonen H; Aistrich A; Borodulin K
Scand J Public Health; 2014 Nov; 42(7):712-7. PubMed ID: 25118200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tailored navigation in colorectal cancer screening.
Myers RE; Hyslop T; Sifri R; Bittner-Fagan H; Katurakes NC; Cocroft J; Dicarlo M; Wolf T
Med Care; 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S123-31. PubMed ID: 18725824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of a pre-screening survey on attendance in colorectal cancer screening: a double-randomized study in Finland.
Helander S; Hakama M; Malila N
J Med Screen; 2014 Jun; 21(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 24803481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Self-reported colonoscopy screening in Austria.
Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Vutuc C
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Aug; 17(4):354-7. PubMed ID: 18562961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-Reported Interest to Participate in a Health Survey if Different Amounts of Cash or Non-Monetary Incentive Types Were Offered.
Zheng G; Oksuzyan S; Hsu S; Cloud J; Jewell MP; Shah N; Smith LV; Frye D; Kuo T
J Urban Health; 2018 Dec; 95(6):837-849. PubMed ID: 29654397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does it pay to pay? A randomized trial of prepaid financial incentives and lottery incentives in surveys of nonphysician healthcare professionals.
Ulrich CM; Danis M; Koziol D; Garrett-Mayer E; Hubbard R; Grady C
Nurs Res; 2005; 54(3):178-83. PubMed ID: 15897793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
