289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27383708)
1. Speech perception and quality of life of open-fit hearing aid users.
Garcia TM; Jacob RT; Mondelli MF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 27383708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audiologic limitations of Vibrant Soundbridge device: Is the contralateral hearing aid fitting indispensable?
Jung J; Roh KJ; Moon IS; Kim SH; Hwang KR; Lee JM; Hou JH; Choi JY
Laryngoscope; 2016 Sep; 126(9):2116-23. PubMed ID: 26774568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Modified Hearing Aid Fittings on Loudness and Tone Quality for Different Acoustic Scenes.
Moore BC; Baer T; Ives DT; Marriage J; Salorio-Corbetto M
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 26928003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Open fitting: performance verification of receiver in the ear and receiver in the aid.
Mondelli MF; Garcia TM; Hashimoto FM; Rocha AV
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 25382428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: the limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction.
Magnusson L; Claesson A; Persson M; Tengstrand T
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 22928919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rehabilitation plasticity: influence of hearing aid fitting on frequency discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cut-off.
Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Collet L
Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 16459036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using Speech Recall in Hearing Aid Fitting and Outcome Evaluation Under Ecological Test Conditions.
Lunner T; Rudner M; Rosenbom T; Ågren J; Ng EH
Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():145S-54S. PubMed ID: 27355764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.
Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):3560-9. PubMed ID: 24907819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.
Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25470620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of wireless and acoustic hearing aid-based telephone listening strategies.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(2):209-20. PubMed ID: 20808225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of compression and hearing aid style on directional hearing aid benefit and performance.
Ricketts T; Lindley G; Henry P
Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):348-61. PubMed ID: 11527041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of high frequencies to speech recognition in quiet and noise in listeners with varying degrees of high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
Amos NE; Humes LE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):819-34. PubMed ID: 17675588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
Boymans M; Dreschler WA
Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Strategies of hearing aids fitting for improving speech recognition in noisy environments].
Boboshko MY; Berdnikova IP; Korotkov YV; Maltseva NV
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2021; 86(2):28-32. PubMed ID: 33929148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
