227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27383970)
1. Let's make peer review scientific.
Rennie D
Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7610):31-3. PubMed ID: 27383970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
Naqvi KR
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Double-blind review: let diversity reign.
O'Hara B
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Robust research: Institutions must do their part for reproducibility.
Begley CG; Buchan AM; Dirnagl U
Nature; 2015 Sep; 525(7567):25-7. PubMed ID: 26333454
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Let's replicate.
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):330. PubMed ID: 16871170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Rule rewrite aims to clean up scientific software.
Check Hayden E
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7547):276-7. PubMed ID: 25877185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Double-blinded manuscript review: Avoiding peer review bias.
Santos A; Morris DS; Rattan R; Zakrison T
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2021 Jul; 91(1):e39-e42. PubMed ID: 33901050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Announcement: double-blind peer review.
Nat Genet; 2015 Mar; 47(3):187. PubMed ID: 25711858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Double-blind peer review].
Fenyvesi T
Orv Hetil; 2002 Feb; 143(5):245-8. PubMed ID: 11875838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review.
Twaij H; Oussedik S; Hoffmeyer P
Bone Joint J; 2014 Apr; 96-B(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 24692607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reviewers support blinding in peer review.
Tierney AJ
J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):113. PubMed ID: 18990091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Peer reviews: make them public.
Mietchen D
Nature; 2011 May; 473(7348):452. PubMed ID: 21614064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer reviewers need more nurturing.
Catlow R
Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7685):293. PubMed ID: 29293240
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-blind review: easy to guess in specialist fields.
Lane D
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A critique and two corrigenda.
Florence AT
Int J Pharm; 2010 Oct; 398(1-2):246. PubMed ID: 20609424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
Lauer MS; Nakamura R
N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
Scarfe WC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Research grants. A radical change in peer review.
Mervis J
Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6194):248-9. PubMed ID: 25035465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review reviewed.
Nature; 2002 May; 417(6885):103. PubMed ID: 12000917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
