These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27384018)

  • 1. MRI-based computational hemodynamics in patients with aortic coarctation using the lattice Boltzmann methods: Clinical validation study.
    Mirzaee H; Henn T; Krause MJ; Goubergrits L; Schumann C; Neugebauer M; Kuehne T; Preusser T; Hennemuth A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 27384018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MRI-based computational fluid dynamics for diagnosis and treatment prediction: clinical validation study in patients with coarctation of aorta.
    Goubergrits L; Riesenkampff E; Yevtushenko P; Schaller J; Kertzscher U; Hennemuth A; Berger F; Schubert S; Kuehne T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 41(4):909-16. PubMed ID: 24723299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainty Quantification for Non-invasive Assessment of Pressure Drop Across a Coarctation of the Aorta Using CFD.
    Brüning J; Hellmeier F; Yevtushenko P; Kühne T; Goubergrits L
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):582-596. PubMed ID: 30284186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Realistic aortic phantom to study hemodynamics using MRI and cardiac catheterization in normal and aortic coarctation conditions.
    Urbina J; Sotelo JA; Springmüller D; Montalba C; Letelier K; Tejos C; Irarrázaval P; Andia ME; Razavi R; Valverde I; Uribe SA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 44(3):683-97. PubMed ID: 26969867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemodynamic assessment of pre- and post-operative aortic coarctation from MRI.
    Ralovich K; Itu L; Mihalef V; Sharma P; Ionasec R; Vitanovski D; Krawtschuk W; Everett A; Ringel R; Navab N; Comaniciu D
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 2):486-93. PubMed ID: 23286084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment, treatment outcome prediction and follow-up of aortic coarctation from MR imaging.
    Ralovich K; Itu L; Vitanovski D; Sharma P; Ionasec R; Mihalef V; Krawtschuk W; Zheng Y; Everett A; Pongiglione G; Leonardi B; Ringel R; Navab N; Heimann T; Comaniciu D
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2143-56. PubMed ID: 25979009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elimination of Transcoarctation Pressure Gradients Has No Impact on Left Ventricular Function or Aortic Shear Stress After Intervention in Patients With Mild Coarctation.
    Keshavarz-Motamed Z; Rikhtegar Nezami F; Partida RA; Nakamura K; Staziaki PV; Ben-Assa E; Ghoshhajra B; Bhatt AB; Edelman ER
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 9(18):1953-65. PubMed ID: 27659574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-specific requirements and clinical validation of MRI-based pressure mapping: A two-center study in patients with aortic coarctation.
    Goubergrits L; Hellmeier F; Neumann D; Mihalef V; Gulsun MA; Chinali M; Secinaro A; Runte K; Schubert S; Berger F; Kuehne T; Hennemuth A; Kelm M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jan; 49(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 30390353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.
    Rengier F; Delles M; Eichhorn J; Azad YJ; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Dillmann R; Kauczor HU; Unterhinninghofen R; Ley S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 31(4):823-30. PubMed ID: 25645544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure fields by flow-sensitive, 4D, velocity-encoded CMR in patients with aortic coarctation.
    Riesenkampff E; Fernandes JF; Meier S; Goubergrits L; Kropf S; Schubert S; Berger F; Hennemuth A; Kuehne T
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Sep; 7(9):920-6. PubMed ID: 25212797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of 4D flow MRI-based non-invasive pressure assessment in aortic coarctations.
    Saitta S; Pirola S; Piatti F; Votta E; Lucherini F; Pluchinotta F; Carminati M; Lombardi M; Geppert C; Cuomo F; Figueroa CA; Xu XY; Redaelli A
    J Biomech; 2019 Sep; 94():13-21. PubMed ID: 31326119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical validation and assessment of aortic hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics simulations from computed tomography angiography.
    Zhu Y; Chen R; Juan YH; Li H; Wang J; Yu Z; Liu H
    Biomed Eng Online; 2018 May; 17(1):53. PubMed ID: 29720173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aortic length measurements for pulse wave velocity calculation: manual 2D vs automated 3D centreline extraction.
    van Engelen A; Silva Vieira M; Rafiq I; Cecelja M; Schneider T; de Bliek H; Figueroa CA; Hussain T; Botnar RM; Alastruey J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Mar; 19(1):32. PubMed ID: 28270208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-invasive hemodynamic assessment of aortic coarctation: validation with in vivo measurements.
    Itu L; Sharma P; Ralovich K; Mihalef V; Ionasec R; Everett A; Ringel R; Kamen A; Comaniciu D
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Apr; 41(4):669-81. PubMed ID: 23232558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved measurement of pressure gradients in aortic coarctation by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Oshinski JN; Parks WJ; Markou CP; Bergman HL; Larson BE; Ku DN; Mukundan S; Pettigrew RI
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 28(7):1818-26. PubMed ID: 8962572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of aortic coarctation with 4D flow MR imaging.
    Hope MD; Meadows AK; Hope TA; Ordovas KG; Saloner D; Reddy GP; Alley MT; Higgins CB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Mar; 31(3):711-8. PubMed ID: 20187217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational fluid dynamic simulations of aortic coarctation comparing the effects of surgical- and stent-based treatments on aortic compliance and ventricular workload.
    Coogan JS; Chan FP; Taylor CA; Feinstein JA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 77(5):680-91. PubMed ID: 21061250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aortic relative pressure components derived from four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Lamata P; Pitcher A; Krittian S; Nordsletten D; Bissell MM; Cassar T; Barker AJ; Markl M; Neubauer S; Smith NP
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):1162-9. PubMed ID: 24243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards non-invasive computational-mechanics and imaging-based diagnostic framework for personalized cardiology for coarctation.
    Sadeghi R; Khodaei S; Ganame J; Keshavarz-Motamed Z
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9048. PubMed ID: 32493936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of an aortic nitinol stent graft on flow measurements by time-resolved three-dimensional velocity-encoded MRI.
    Rengier F; Delles M; Unterhinninghofen R; Ley S; Partovi S; Dillmann R; Kauczor HU; von Tengg-Kobligk H
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 22177284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.