These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27384238)

  • 1. The modelling of odour dispersion as a support tool for the improvements of high odours impact plants.
    Luciano A; Torretta V; Mancini G; Eleuteri A; Raboni M; Viotti P
    Environ Technol; 2017 Mar; 38(5):588-597. PubMed ID: 27384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Odour impact assessment by considering short-term ambient concentrations: A multi-model and two-site comparison.
    Invernizzi M; Brancher M; Sironi S; Capelli L; Piringer M; Schauberger G
    Environ Int; 2020 Nov; 144():105990. PubMed ID: 32795747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of different approaches for the estimation of odour emissions from landfill surfaces.
    Lucernoni F; Capelli L; Sironi S
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():345-353. PubMed ID: 27769653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Olfactometric approach for the evaluation of citizens' exposure to industrial emissions in the city of Terni, Italy.
    Capelli L; Sironi S; Del Rosso R; Céntola P; Rossi A; Austeri C
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(3):595-603. PubMed ID: 21106227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pragmatic evaluation of odour emissions from a rendering plant in southern Brazil.
    Vieira MM; Schirmer WN; de Melo Lisboa H; Belli Filho P; Guillot JM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Dec; 23(23):24115-24124. PubMed ID: 27640055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between conventional biofilters and biotrickling filters applied to waste bio-drying in terms of atmospheric dispersion and air quality.
    Schiavon M; Ragazzi M; Torretta V; Rada EC
    Environ Technol; 2016; 37(8):975-82. PubMed ID: 26406537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Odour-impact assessment around a landfill site from weather-type classification, complaint inventory and numerical simulation.
    Chemel C; Riesenmey C; Batton-Hubert M; Vaillant H
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Jan; 93(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 22054574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of different approaches for odour impact assessment: dispersion modelling (CALPUFF) vs field inspection (CEN/TC 264).
    Dentoni L; Capelli L; Sironi S; Guillot JM; Rossi AN
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(8):1731-8. PubMed ID: 24185053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterisation of odour masking agents often used in the solid waste industry for odour abatement.
    Decottignies V; Filippi G; Bruchet A
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(5):359-64. PubMed ID: 17489429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Co-current and counter-current spraying of odour-neutralizing products.
    Bouzin-Turpin A; Couvert A; Laplanche A; Paillier A
    Environ Technol; 2009 Dec; 30(14):1511-7. PubMed ID: 20183995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a novel wind tunnel for the measurement of the kinetics of odour emissions from piggery effluent.
    Sohn JH; Smith R; Yoong E; Hudson N; Kim TI
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):49-55. PubMed ID: 15484742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact assessment of odours emitted by a wastewater treatment plant.
    Beghi SP; Santos JM; Reis NC; de Sá LM; Goulart EV; de Abreu Costa E
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(10):2223-8. PubMed ID: 22949255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the inter-annual variability of separation distances around odour sources to protect the residents from odour annoyance.
    Brancher M; Piringer M; Franco D; Belli Filho P; De Melo Lisboa H; Schauberger G
    J Environ Sci (China); 2019 May; 79():11-24. PubMed ID: 30784436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of odour impact criteria in selected countries around the world.
    Brancher M; Griffiths KD; Franco D; de Melo Lisboa H
    Chemosphere; 2017 Feb; 168():1531-1570. PubMed ID: 27939667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of airborne microorganisms, MVOC and odour in the surrounding of composting facilities and implications for future investigations.
    Fischer G; Albrecht A; Jäckel U; Kämpfer P
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2008 Mar; 211(1-2):132-42. PubMed ID: 17936684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Odour annoyance in a residential area near a papermill.
    van den Hazel PJ; Waegemaekers CH
    Public Health Rev; 1991-1992; 19(1-4):251-62. PubMed ID: 1844274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of activated sludge diffusion for biological treatment of hydrogen sulphide gas emissions.
    Barbosa VL; Stuetz RM
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(9):1932-9. PubMed ID: 24225092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applicability of sniffing team observations: experience of field measurements.
    Van Langenhove H; Van Broeck G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):65-70. PubMed ID: 11762485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrated odour modelling for sewage treatment works.
    Gostelow P; Parsons SA; Lovell M
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(4):169-76. PubMed ID: 15484758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Efficacy of the analytic approach in evaluation of biofilter activity in a composting system].
    Fiore M; Cicciù F; Cunsolo M; Fallico R; Sciacca S; Ferrante M
    Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2011; 67(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 21468151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.