These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2738463)

  • 1. A validity study of the Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition with students with learning disabilities.
    Smith DK; St Martin ME; Lyon MA
    J Learn Disabil; 1989 Apr; 22(4):260-1. PubMed ID: 2738463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition: a small study of concurrent validity.
    Hollinger CL; Baldwin C
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 2):1331-6. PubMed ID: 2385722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing scores on the Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition with the WISC-R for exceptional children.
    Hollinger CL; Baldwin C
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 1):979-84. PubMed ID: 1696017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential validity of the K-ABC for lower functioning preschool children versus those of higher ability.
    Bloom AS; Allard AM; Zelko FA; Brill WJ; Topinka CW; Pfohl W
    Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 3228519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Kaufman's short form of the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales--Fourth Edition.
    Karr SK; Carvajal H; Palmer BL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1120-2. PubMed ID: 1501979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationships between scores on Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence--Revised and Stanford-Binet IV.
    Carvajal HH; Parks JP; Bays KJ; Logan RA; Lujano CI; Page GL; Weaver KA
    Psychol Rep; 1991 Aug; 69(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 1961799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of preschoolers at-risk with the WPPSI--R and the Stanford-Binet L-M.
    Gerken KC; Hodapp AF
    Psychol Rep; 1992 Oct; 71(2):659-64. PubMed ID: 1410125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Construct validity of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with mildly mentally retarded students.
    Obrzut A; Nelson RB; Obrzut JE
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Jul; 92(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 3618659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IQ discrepancies between the Binet and WISC-R in children with developmental problems.
    Bloom AS; Reese A; Altshuler L; Meckler CL; Raskin LM
    J Clin Psychol; 1983 Jul; 39(4):600-3. PubMed ID: 6875001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition and the WISC--R for children in the lower range of intelligence.
    Lukens J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):819-22. PubMed ID: 2377415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External validity of the profile variability index for the K-ABC, Stanford-Binet, and WISC-R: another cul de-sac.
    Kline RB; Snyder J; Guilmette S; Castellanos M
    J Learn Disabil; 1993 Oct; 26(8):557-67. PubMed ID: 8245701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition short forms with underachieving and learning disabled students.
    Lawson TT; Evans LD
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Aug; 79(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8873787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlations between scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III and the General Purpose Abbreviated Battery of the Stanford-Binet IV.
    Carvajal HH; Hayes JE; Lackey KL; Rathke ML; Wiebe DA; Weaver KA
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Jun; 72(3 Pt 2):1167-70. PubMed ID: 8337322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent validity study of the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised in mental retardation testing.
    Kunen S; Overstreet S; Salles C
    Ment Retard; 1996 Dec; 34(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 8990822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the Stanford-Binet abbreviated and complete forms for developmentally disabled children.
    Bloom AS; Klee SH; Raskin LM
    J Clin Psychol; 1977 Apr; 33(2):477-82. PubMed ID: 870534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of an item-reduction short form of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition with college students.
    Nagle RJ; Bell NL
    J Clin Psychol; 1995 Jan; 51(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 7782477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring the intelligence of college students with learning disabilities: a comparison of results obtained on the WAIS-R and the KAIT.
    Morgan AW; Sullivan SA; Darden C; Gregg N
    J Learn Disabil; 1997; 30(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 9293238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition and form L-M in assessment of young children with mental retardation.
    Wilson WM
    Ment Retard; 1992 Apr; 30(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 1584032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of three-year-olds with the Stanford-Binet Fourth Edition.
    Johnson DL; Howie VM; Owen M; Baldwin CD; Luttman D
    Psychol Rep; 1993 Aug; 73(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 8367579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and validity of ratio developmental quotients from the Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale.
    Atkinson L
    Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 1699557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.