These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27384635)

  • 1. [Network meta-analysis: mixed and indirect treatment comparisons. a new method to the service of clinical epidemiology and public health].
    García-Perdomo HA; Tobías A
    Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica; 2016 Mar; 33(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 27384635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indirect comparisons of treatment effects: Network meta-analyses.
    Sormani MP
    Mult Scler; 2017 Apr; 23(4):510-512. PubMed ID: 28273772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
    Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Basic concepts for network meta-analysis].
    Catalá-López F; Tobías A; Roqué M
    Aten Primaria; 2014 Dec; 46(10):573-81. PubMed ID: 24796656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Development of an Excel spreadsheet for meta-analysis of indirect and mixed treatment comparisons].
    Tobías A; Catalá-López F; Roqué M
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2014; 88(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 24728389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.
    Lin L; Xing A; Kofler MJ; Murad MH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():41-49. PubMed ID: 30342086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to prevent delirium in critically ill patients: a protocol for a systematic review incorporating network meta-analyses.
    Burry LD; Hutton B; Guenette M; Williamson D; Mehta S; Egerod I; Kanji S; Adhikari NK; Moher D; Martin CM; Rose L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Sep; 5(1):153. PubMed ID: 27609018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.
    Hoaglin DC; Hawkins N; Jansen JP; Scott DA; Itzler R; Cappelleri JC; Boersma C; Thompson D; Larholt KM; Diaz M; Barrett A
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 21669367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research.
    Roever L; Biondi-Zoccai G
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 106(4):333-7. PubMed ID: 27142793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Network meta-analysis: an introduction for pharmacists.
    Xu Y; Amiche MA; Tadrous M
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2018 Oct; 40(5):942-947. PubMed ID: 29785685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A simple formula for enumerating comparisons in trials and network meta-analysis.
    Shokraneh F; Adams CE
    F1000Res; 2019; 8():38. PubMed ID: 30863537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction to network meta-analysis for evidence synthesis.
    González-Xuriguera CG; Vergara-Merino L; Garegnani L; Ortiz-Muñoz L; Meza N
    Medwave; 2021 Jul; 21(6):e8315. PubMed ID: 34292922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.
    Efthimiou O; Debray TP; van Valkenhoef G; Trelle S; Panayidou K; Moons KG; Reitsma JB; Shang A; Salanti G;
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):236-63. PubMed ID: 26754852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Indirect comparison and network meta-analyses--new tools for the assessment of evidence on the relative efficacy of drugs].
    Peura P; Asseburg C; Turunen J; Purmonen T; Martikainen J
    Duodecim; 2011; 127(9):900-10. PubMed ID: 21648163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons.
    Tonin FS; Rotta I; Mendes AM; Pontarolo R
    Pharm Pract (Granada); 2017; 15(1):943. PubMed ID: 28503228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying indirect evidence in network meta-analysis.
    Noma H; Tanaka S; Matsui S; Cipriani A; Furukawa TA
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):917-927. PubMed ID: 27917493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Network meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: what is it and why is it posed to dominate cardiovascular decision making?
    Biondi-Zoccai G; Abbate A; Benedetto U; Palmerini T; D'Ascenzo F; Frati G
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 182():309-14. PubMed ID: 25585376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4114-4125. PubMed ID: 30019428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians.
    Rouse B; Chaimani A; Li T
    Intern Emerg Med; 2017 Feb; 12(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 27913917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.