95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 273854)
1. Compensation of differences in density of radiographs by densitometry.
Duinkerke AS; Van de Poel AC; Van der Linden FP; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Apr; 45(4):637-42. PubMed ID: 273854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Densitometric analysis of experimentally produced periapical radiolucencies.
Duinkerke AS; van de Poel AC; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1977 May; 43(5):782-97. PubMed ID: 266159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone density measurements in intra-oral radiographs.
Nackaerts O; Jacobs R; Horner K; Zhao F; Lindh C; Karayianni K; van der Stelt P; Pavitt S; Devlin H
Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Sep; 11(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 17668257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of beam quality and optical density on image quality in dental radiography.
Price C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Nov; 62(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 3466130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extraction site healing in rats. A radiologic densitometric study.
Bodner L; Kaffe I; Littner MM; Cohen J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Mar; 75(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 8469551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs.
Duckworth JE; Judy PF; Goodson JM; Socransky SS
J Periodontol; 1983 Jul; 54(7):435-40. PubMed ID: 6577180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dental radiographic diagnostic resolution with minimal exposure.
Klein AI; Campbell E; Yim P; Synenberg W
Pediatr Dent; 1985 Mar; 7(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 3857560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Densitometric measurements of the mandible: accuracy and validity of intraoral versus extraoral radiographical techniques in an in vitro study.
Verhoeven JW; Ruijter JM; Cune MS; de Putter C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1998 Oct; 9(5):333-42. PubMed ID: 9835813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Descriptive study of mandibular canal visibility: morphometric and densitometric analysis for digital panoramic radiographs.
Kubilius M; Kubilius R; Varinauskas V; Žalinkevičius R; Tözüm TF; Juodžbalys G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160079. PubMed ID: 27167456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of compensation filters in pedal radiographs.
Jennings MB; Cohen RE; Marino JP; Jensis-Carlson ML; Pollizzi AJ; Schwartz DM; Gallentine SL
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1999 Apr; 89(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 10220986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of beam hardening on digital subtraction radiography.
Webber RL; Tzukert A; Ruttimann U
J Periodontal Res; 1989 Jan; 24(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2524570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dental radiographic identification utilising computerised digital slice interposition: a case report.
Tai CC; Blenkinsop BR; Wood RE
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1993 Jun; 11(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 9227060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of rare-earth filters on patient exposure and image contrast.
Mauriello SM; Washburn DB; Matteson SR
J Dent Res; 1987 Aug; 66(8):1326-30. PubMed ID: 3476600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of linear measurements made from storage phosphor and dental radiographs.
Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Yokoyama-Crothers N
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Nov; 25(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 9161181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic analysis of regenerated bone around endosseous implants in the canine using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2.
Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Jones AA; Makins SR; Turek TJ; Buser D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 9425754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal parameters for lateral oblique radiographs of rat mandibles.
Mahl CR; Fontanella V
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 18460576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.
Farrier SL; Drage NA; Newcombe RG; Hayes SJ; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 19548931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the quality of radiographs accompanying biopsy specimens.
Rumberg H; Hollender L; Oda D
J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Mar; 127(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 8819783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Energy-selective filtration of dental x-ray beams.
Gelskey DE; Baker CG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Nov; 52(5):565-7. PubMed ID: 6946385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
