These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 273854)

  • 21. Effects of technical parameters on image perception using two types of dental radiographs.
    Nielsen PM; Weber HP; zen Ruffinen S; Brecx M; Joss A; Lang NP
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1989; 99(7):777-81. PubMed ID: 2692154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Penetration quality measurement for standardization of radiographic image quality.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 1975; 2(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 1128460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A radiographic evaluation of unloaded nonsubmerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Cochran DL; Nummikoski PV; Buser D
    J Periodontol; 1997 Nov; 68(11):1117-30. PubMed ID: 9407406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Mouyen F; Benz C; Sonnabend E; Lodter JP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 2780024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of varying peak kilovoltage and filtration on diagnostic dental radiographs.
    Oishi TT; Parfitt GJ
    Dent J; 1976 Sep; 42(9):449-52. PubMed ID: 1067261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of automatic exposure control in a direct digital intraoral system.
    Benchimol D; Näsström K; Shi X
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 19700535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Measuring cortical thickness on panoramic radiographs: a validation study of the Mental Index.
    Dutra V; Susin C; da Costa NP; Veeck EB; Bahlis A; Fernandes Ada R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Nov; 104(5):686-91. PubMed ID: 17656120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?
    Berkhout WE; Beuger DA; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 15140814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Intraoral radiographs of dental implants in the edentulous mandible].
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jul; 102(7):258-62. PubMed ID: 11837109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standardized radiographs of the alveolar crest around implants in the mandible.
    Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 68(2):318-21. PubMed ID: 1501182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Exposure times at which dental xeroradiographs and radiographs have comparable optical density.
    Alexander JB; Andrews JD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Sep; 66(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 3174071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of new radiographic screens for intraoral radiography.
    Dawood FF; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Aug; 48(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 289085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Chemical intensification of dental radiographs.
    Price C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Apr; 55(4):427-33. PubMed ID: 6574420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality.
    Dannewitz B; Hassfeld S; Eickholz P; Mühling J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11803389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Xeroradiography of dental structures. I. Preliminary investigations.
    Gratt BM; Sickles EA; Parks CP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1977 Jul; 44(1):148-52. PubMed ID: 267873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Radiographic variability: compensation of time and tension].
    Carozzi G
    Riv Ital Odontotec; 1982; 18(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 6962464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of scattered radiation on the quality of intraoral radiographs.
    de Wit JD; van Aken J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 3460906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Values of densitometric analysis of radiographs in everyday practice].
    Gojkov T; Kućanski B; Fuks Z
    Stomatol Vjesn; 1986; 15(1-2):69-73. PubMed ID: 3484146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Density of intraoral radiographic film processed in dental clinics in Denmark].
    Sewerin I; Stoltze K
    Tandlaegebladet; 1986 Nov; 90(19):853-9. PubMed ID: 3468657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.