These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27387279)
1. Comparison of High, Intermediate, and Low Frequency Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Urinary Tract Stone Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Kang DH; Cho KS; Ham WS; Lee H; Kwon JK; Choi YD; Lee JY PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158661. PubMed ID: 27387279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Chung DY; Kang DH; Cho KS; Jeong WS; Jung HD; Kwon JK; Lee SH; Lee JY PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211316. PubMed ID: 30789937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy. Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Case Volume on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Data from the National Shock Wave Lithotripsy Database of New Zealand. Alexander CE; Gowland S; Cadwallader J; Hopkins D; Reynard JM; Turney BW J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):655-659. PubMed ID: 30963786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review. Drake T; Grivas N; Dabestani S; Knoll T; Lam T; Maclennan S; Petrik A; Skolarikos A; Straub M; Tuerk C; Yuan CY; Sarica K Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):772-786. PubMed ID: 28456350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi. Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal frequency of shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Li K; Lin T; Zhang C; Fan X; Xu K; Bi L; Han J; Huang H; Liu H; Dong W; Duan Y; Yu M; Huang J J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1260-7. PubMed ID: 23538240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of intermediate- and low-frequency shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones. Kaygısız O; Kılıçarslan H; Mert A; Coşkun B; Kordan Y Urolithiasis; 2018 Aug; 46(4):391-395. PubMed ID: 28756458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of YAG Laser Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Meta-Analysis. Yang C; Li S; Cui Y Urol Int; 2017; 98(4):373-381. PubMed ID: 27798945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shen P; Jiang M; Yang J; Li X; Li Y; Wei W; Dai Y; Zeng H; Wang J J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1328-35. PubMed ID: 21855945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Intermediate or low: a prospective randomized study. Kaygisiz O; Cicek MC; Mert A; Akesen S; Sarandol E; Kilicarslan H World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3963-3969. PubMed ID: 33890144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. Semins MJ; Trock BJ; Matlaga BR J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):194-7; discussion 197. PubMed ID: 18001796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Efficacy and Safety of Tamsulosin Combined with Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Chen K; Mi H; Xu G; Liu L; Sun X; Wang S; Meng Q; Lv T J Endourol; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1166-76. PubMed ID: 25915454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children. Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone. Chang KD; Lee JY; Park SY; Kang DH; Lee HH; Cho KS Yonsei Med J; 2017 Sep; 58(5):1000-1005. PubMed ID: 28792145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Does SWL for ureteral stone with less than 60 shock waves per minute improve treatment results?]. Nishiyama R; Kubota M; Kanno T; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Jul; 105(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 25158551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy. Li WM; Wu WJ; Chou YH; Liu CC; Wang CJ; Huang CH; Lee YC Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 17851280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The efficacy and safety of diuretics on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of urolithiasis: A systematic review and meta analysis. Dong L; Wang F; Chen H; Lu Y; Zhang Y; Chen L; Cui Y Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jun; 99(25):e20602. PubMed ID: 32569188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [What is the current status of shock wave lithotripsy?]. Neisius A Urologe A; 2017 Sep; 56(9):1147-1157. PubMed ID: 28766005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]