These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27388055)

  • 81. The negative impact of depressive symptoms on patient and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis: a prospective cohort study.
    Lin J; Ye H; Yi C; Li J; Yu X; Zhu L; Zhang X; Wu X; Mao H; Yu X; Yang X
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Dec; 52(12):2393-2401. PubMed ID: 32794118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Treated with Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in Singapore.
    Yang F; Luo N; Lau T; Yu ZL; Foo MWY; Griva K
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2018 Jun; 2(2):203-208. PubMed ID: 29623617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. A 2-year follow-up study of patients on automated peritoneal dialysis.
    Rao CS; Charan P; Naidu GD; Swarnalatha G; Ram R; Dakshinamurty KV
    Indian J Nephrol; 2013 Sep; 23(5):327-31. PubMed ID: 24049266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: evaluation in large incident cohorts.
    Guo A; Mujais S
    Kidney Int Suppl; 2003 Dec; (88):S3-12. PubMed ID: 14870873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. The role of omentectomy in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
    Nicholson ML; Burton PR; Donnelly PK; Veitch PS; Walls J
    Perit Dial Int; 1991; 11(4):330-2. PubMed ID: 1751599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Evaluation of the Impact of Remote Monitoring Using the Sharesource Connectivity Platform on Adherence to Automated Peritoneal Dialysis in 51 Patients.
    Chang MY; Chi PJ; Wang HH; Lee YC; Ho LC; Wu CF; Chen CY; Liou HH; Hung SY
    Med Sci Monit; 2023 Apr; 29():e939523. PubMed ID: 37020409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Technique failure in remote patient monitoring program in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis: A retrospective cohort study.
    Corzo L; Wilkie M; Vesga JI; Lindholm B; Buitrago G; Rivera AS; Sanabria RM
    Perit Dial Int; 2022 May; 42(3):288-296. PubMed ID: 33380265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Patient Perspectives and Outcomes.
    Domenici A; Giuliani A
    Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis; 2021; 14():385-392. PubMed ID: 34675604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Increase of intra-abdominal fat in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
    Fernström A; Hylander B; Moritz A; Jacobsson H; Rössner S
    Perit Dial Int; 1998; 18(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 9576364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Longitudinal Experience with Remote Monitoring for Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.
    Milan Manani S; Rosner MH; Virzì GM; Giuliani A; Berti S; Crepaldi C; Ronco C
    Nephron; 2019; 142(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30699410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. A comparison between the costs of dialysis treatments in Marche Region, Italy: Macerata and Tolentino hospitals.
    Vaccaro CM; Sopranzi F
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2017; 53(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 29297866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Improved management of congestive heart failure. Use of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
    König P; Geissler D; Lechleitner P; Spielberger M; Dittrich P
    Arch Intern Med; 1987 Jun; 147(6):1031-4. PubMed ID: 3592870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. 3D Low-Cost Equipment for Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Therapy.
    Rivero-Urzua S; Paredes-Rojas JC; Méndez-García SR; Ortiz-Hernández FE; Oropeza-Osornio A; Torres-SanMiguel CR
    Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 35327042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Health economic evaluation of peritoneal dialysis based on cost-effectiveness in Japan: a preliminary study.
    Takura T; Hiramatsu M; Nakamoto H; Kuragano T; Minakuchi J; Ishida H; Nakayama M; Takahashi S; Kawanishi H
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2019; 11():579-590. PubMed ID: 31576157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Technique survival and complication rates in a newly started CAPD center (five years of experience).
    Bistrup C; Holm-Nielsen A; Pedersen RS
    Perit Dial Int; 1996; 16(1):90-1. PubMed ID: 8616184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Efficacy of APD in perioperative period of non-abdominal operation for peritoneal dialysis patients.
    Zhang Y; Feng S; Lu Y; Zhan Z; Shen H
    Int J Gen Med; 2019; 12():207-212. PubMed ID: 31213879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Time on Therapy of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis with and without Remote Patient Monitoring: A Cohort Study.
    Sanabria M; Vesga J; Lindholm B; Rivera A; Rutherford P
    Int J Nephrol; 2022; 2022():8646775. PubMed ID: 36045901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Need for vascular access in CAPD patients in Brazil.
    Divino Filho JC; Almeida FP; Lobo E; Boccato N; Moron J; Linardi F; Costa JA
    Contrib Nephrol; 1991; 89():40-2. PubMed ID: 1893738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Improving quality of life for dialysis patients through telecare.
    Stroetmann KA; Gruetzmacher P; Stroetmann VN
    J Telemed Telecare; 2000; 6 Suppl 1():S80-3. PubMed ID: 10793981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Compliance with automated peritoneal dialysis.
    Rivetti M; Battú S; Barrile P; Benotto S; Berruto L; Bosio A; d'Auria L
    EDTNA ERCA J; 2002; 28(1):40-3, 55. PubMed ID: 12035903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.