These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27388249)

  • 1. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.
    O'Boyle C; Chen SI; Little JA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC; Firth AY
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of printed and computerised crowded Kay picture logMAR tests against gold standard ETDRS acuity test chart measurements in adult and amblyopic paediatric subjects.
    Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Rashid S; Hysi P
    Eye (Lond); 2012 Apr; 26(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 22193878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters.
    McVeigh EM; Ludden SM; Mohamed S; Shah N; Mulholland PJ; Dahlmann-Noor A
    Eye (Lond); 2022 Dec; 36(12):2341-2345. PubMed ID: 34987195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there value in measuring near visual acuity during occlusion therapy for amblyopia?
    Daly MY; Codina CJ; Arblaster GE
    Strabismus; 2023 Dec; 31(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 37921023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term changes in visual acuity and refractive error in amblyopes.
    Rutstein RP; Corliss DA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 15252350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of stimulus configuration on crowding in strabismic amblyopia.
    Norgett Y; Siderov J
    J Vis; 2017 Nov; 17(13):5. PubMed ID: 29114805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart.
    Inal A; Ocak OB; Aygit ED; Yilmaz I; Inal B; Taskapili M; Gokyigit B
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 28639088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A morphological study of amblyopic eyes in children failing to achieve normal visual acuity after electronically monitored long-term occlusion treatment.
    Kuhli-Hattenbach C; Koss MJ; Kohnen T; Fronius M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 253(11):2021-8. PubMed ID: 26100453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual acuity assessment: a comparison of two tests for measuring children's vision.
    Jones D; Westall C; Averbeck K; Abdolell M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2003 Nov; 23(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 14622358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Landolt C-Tests With "Fixed" Arcmin Separations Detect Amblyopia But Underestimate Crowding in Moderate-to-Severe Amblyopic Children and Adults.
    Waugh SJ; Fronius M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2024 Aug; 65(10):33. PubMed ID: 39177974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crowding in children's visual acuity tests--effect of test design and age.
    Norgett Y; Siderov J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Aug; 88(8):920-7. PubMed ID: 21532515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The differing impact of induced astigmatic blur on crowded and uncrowded paediatric visual acuity chart results.
    Little JA; Molloy J; Saunders KJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):492-500. PubMed ID: 23009274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia.
    Wenner Y; Heinrich SP; Beisse C; Fuchs A; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 128(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 24623357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
    Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.
    Ruttum MS; Dahlgren M
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical treatment of amblyopia in older children and adults is essential prior to enrolment in a clinical trial.
    Gao TY; Anstice N; Babu RJ; Black JM; Bobier WR; Dai S; Guo CX; Hess RF; Jenkins M; Jiang Y; Kearns L; Kowal L; Lam CSY; Pang PCK; Parag V; South J; Staffieri SE; Wadham A; Walker N; Thompson B;
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):129-143. PubMed ID: 29356022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modified Allen pictures to assess amblyopia in young children.
    Mayer DL; Gross RD
    Ophthalmology; 1990 Jun; 97(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 2374689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.