These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27388267)

  • 1. Influence of material properties on gloves' bacterial barrier efficacy in the presence of microperforation.
    Bardorf MH; Jäger B; Boeckmans E; Kramer A; Assadian O
    Am J Infect Control; 2016 Dec; 44(12):1645-1649. PubMed ID: 27388267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Puncture resistance and stiffness of nitrile and latex dental examination gloves.
    Patel HB; Fleming GJ; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2004 Jun; 196(11):695-700; discussion 685; quiz 707. PubMed ID: 15192735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Permeability of nitrile rubber, latex, polyurethane, and neoprene gloves to 18 antineoplastic drugs.
    Connor TH
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 1999 Dec; 56(23):2450-3. PubMed ID: 10595805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the level of dexterity offered by latex and nitrile SafeSkin gloves.
    Sawyer J; Bennett A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Apr; 50(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 16357028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical performance of powder-free examination gloves.
    Fisher MD; Reddy VR; Williams FM; Lin KY; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Emerg Med; 1999; 17(6):1011-8. PubMed ID: 10595890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In-use barrier integrity of gloves: latex and nitrile superior to vinyl.
    Rego A; Roley L
    Am J Infect Control; 1999 Oct; 27(5):405-10. PubMed ID: 10511487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in chemical permeation of disposable latex, nitrile, and vinyl gloves exposed to simulated movement.
    Phalen RN; Le T; Wong WK
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(11):716-21. PubMed ID: 24689368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for viral penetration of non-latex surgical and examination gloves: a comparison of three methods.
    O'Connell KP; El-Masri M; Broyles JB; Korniewicz DM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2004 Apr; 10(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 15059121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A laboratory-based study to assess the performance of surgical gloves.
    Korniewicz DM; El-Masri MM; Broyles JM; Martin CD; O'Connell KP
    AORN J; 2003 Apr; 77(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 12705733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An assessment of the incidence of punctures in latex and non-latex dental examination gloves in routine clinical practice.
    Murray CA; Burke FJ; McHugh S
    Br Dent J; 2001 Apr; 190(7):377-80. PubMed ID: 11338041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concentration of bacteria passing through puncture holes in surgical gloves.
    Harnoss JC; Partecke LI; Heidecke CD; Hübner NO; Kramer A; Assadian O
    Am J Infect Control; 2010 Mar; 38(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 19822380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abrasion resistance of medical glove materials.
    Walsh DL; Schwerin MR; Kisielewski RW; Kotz RM; Chaput MP; Varney GW; To TM
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2004 Jan; 68(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 14689500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A preliminary report on the incidence of pre-existing pinhole defects in nitrile dental gloves.
    Patel HB; Fleming GJ; Burke FJ
    Br Dent J; 2003 Nov; 195(9):509-12; discussion 505. PubMed ID: 14610561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Failure of glove hole detection device for synthetic gloves.
    Neal JG; Jackson EM; Cox MJ; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 10029145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical performance of latex and non-latex double-glove systems.
    Fisher MD; Reddy VR; Williams FM; Lin KY; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1999; 48(6):797-806. PubMed ID: 10556843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised trial of the durability of non-allergenic latex-free surgical gloves versus latex gloves.
    Newsom SW; Smith MO; Shaw P
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1998 Jul; 80(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 9771234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chlorhexidine-coated surgical gloves influence the bacterial flora of hands over a period of 3 hours.
    Suchomel M; Brillmann M; Assadian O; Ousey KJ; Presterl E
    Antimicrob Resist Infect Control; 2018; 7():108. PubMed ID: 30202521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Update on the Innovative Surgical Double-Glove Hole Puncture Indication Systems: Reliability and Performance.
    Edlich R; Wind TC; Heather CL; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2017; 27(2-4):339-353. PubMed ID: 29773048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and performance of innovative surgical double-glove hole puncture indication systems.
    Edlich RF; Wind TC; Heather CL; Thacker JG
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2003; 13(2):69-83. PubMed ID: 14510280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of latex and nonlatex medical examination gloves during simulated use.
    Korniewicz DM; El-Masri M; Broyles JM; Martin CD; O'connell KP
    Am J Infect Control; 2002 Apr; 30(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 11944004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.