These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27388428)

  • 1. Probabilistically determining the cellular source of DNA derived from differential extractions in sexual assault scenarios.
    Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():124-135. PubMed ID: 27388428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
    Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the efficacy of the standard DNA differential extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
    Timken MD; Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():170-177. PubMed ID: 29494880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
    Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
    Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forensic techniques for the isolation of spermatozoa from sexual assault samples - A review.
    Chapman BR; Blackwell SJ; Müller LH
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2020 Jul; 32(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 32712578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cold Case Homicides: DNA Testing of Retained Autopsy Sexual Assault Smears.
    Clark M; Gill J; Sasinouski K; McGuire A
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jul; 64(4):1100-1104. PubMed ID: 30731031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Helping to distinguish primary from secondary transfer events for trace DNA.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Samie L; Pun KM; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():155-177. PubMed ID: 28273508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developmental validation of an efficient differential separation method incorporating the i-sep
    White TJ; Rye MS; Tay JW
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1679-1689. PubMed ID: 35373351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
    Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sperm elution: an improved two phase recovery method for sexual assault samples.
    Hulme P; Lewis J; Davidson G
    Sci Justice; 2013 Mar; 53(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 23380059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A template for constructing Bayesian networks in forensic biology cases when considering activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():136-146. PubMed ID: 29275089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Use of Laser Microdissection in Forensic Sexual Assault Casework: Pros and Cons Compared to Standard Methods.
    Costa S; Correia-de-Sá P; Porto MJ; Cainé L
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Jul; 62(4):998-1006. PubMed ID: 28133731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective study on the transfer, persistence and recovery of sperm and epithelial cells in samples collected in sexual assault casework.
    Fonneløp AE; Johannessen H; Heen G; Molland K; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102153. PubMed ID: 31505370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
    Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
    Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
    Horsman KM; Barker SL; Ferrance JP; Forrest KA; Koen KA; Landers JP
    Anal Chem; 2005 Feb; 77(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 15679339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of hematoxylin reagent for sperm cell separation in sexual crime evidence.
    Kim JY; Kim MI; Lee HH; Kim HL; Lee EJ; Lee YH; Hwang IK; Chun BW; Kang PW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Feb; 307():110114. PubMed ID: 31901461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automation of the Differential Digestion Process of Sexual Assault Evidence.
    Wong H; Mihalovich J
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 30044890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced DNA mixture deconvolution of sexual offense samples using the DEPArray™ system.
    Williamson VR; Laris TM; Romano R; Marciano MA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 May; 34():265-276. PubMed ID: 29602061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A proof of principal study on the use of direct PCR of semen and spermatozoa and development of a differential isolation protocol for use in cases of alleged sexual assault.
    Tobe SS; Swaran YC; Dennany L; Sibbing U; Schulze Johann K; Welch L; Vennemann M
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 27832353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.