These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27388877)

  • 1. Using automatically extracted information from mammography reports for decision-support.
    Bozkurt S; Gimenez F; Burnside ES; Gulkesen KH; Rubin DL
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Aug; 62():224-31. PubMed ID: 27388877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The implementation of natural language processing to extract index lesions from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports.
    Liu Y; Liu Q; Han C; Zhang X; Wang X
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Dec; 19(1):288. PubMed ID: 31888615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic abstraction of imaging observations with their characteristics from mammography reports.
    Bozkurt S; Lipson JA; Senol U; Rubin DL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Apr; 22(e1):e81-92. PubMed ID: 25352567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated extraction of BI-RADS final assessment categories from radiology reports with natural language processing.
    Sippo DA; Warden GI; Andriole KP; Lacson R; Ikuta I; Birdwell RL; Khorasani R
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):989-94. PubMed ID: 23868515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated annotation and classification of BI-RADS assessment from radiology reports.
    Castro SM; Tseytlin E; Medvedeva O; Mitchell K; Visweswaran S; Bekhuis T; Jacobson RS
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 May; 69():177-187. PubMed ID: 28428140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic extraction of imaging observation and assessment categories from breast magnetic resonance imaging reports with natural language processing.
    Liu Y; Zhu LN; Liu Q; Han C; Zhang XD; Wang XY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Jul; 132(14):1673-1680. PubMed ID: 31268905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic classification and prioritisation of actionable BI-RADS categories using natural language processing models.
    López-Úbeda P; Martín-Noguerol T; Luna A
    Clin Radiol; 2024 Jan; 79(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 37838546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated detection of ambiguity in BI-RADS assessment categories in mammography reports.
    Bozkurt S; Rubin D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 197():35-9. PubMed ID: 24743074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Annotation for information extraction from mammography reports.
    Bozkurt S; Gulkesen KH; Rubin D
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 190():183-5. PubMed ID: 23823416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automatic inference of BI-RADS final assessment categories from narrative mammography report findings.
    Banerjee I; Bozkurt S; Alkim E; Sagreiya H; Kurian AW; Rubin DL
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Apr; 92():103137. PubMed ID: 30807833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlating mammographic and pathologic findings in clinical decision support using natural language processing and data mining methods.
    Patel TA; Puppala M; Ogunti RO; Ensor JE; He T; Shewale JB; Ankerst DP; Kaklamani VG; Rodriguez AA; Wong ST; Chang JC
    Cancer; 2017 Jan; 123(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 27571243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an online, publicly accessible naive Bayesian decision support tool for mammographic mass lesions based on the American College of Radiology (ACR) BI-RADS lexicon.
    Benndorf M; Kotter E; Langer M; Herda C; Wu Y; Burnside ES
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Jun; 25(6):1768-75. PubMed ID: 25576230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
    Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comprehensive Word-Level Classification of Screening Mammography Reports Using a Neural Network Sequence Labeling Approach.
    Short RG; Bralich J; Bogaty D; Befera NT
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Oct; 32(5):685-692. PubMed ID: 30338478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A New Computer-Aided Diagnosis System with Modified Genetic Feature Selection for BI-RADS Classification of Breast Masses in Mammograms.
    Boumaraf S; Liu X; Ferkous C; Ma X
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7695207. PubMed ID: 32462017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
    Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the accuracy of lung-RADS score extraction from radiology reports: Manual entry versus natural language processing.
    Gandomi A; Hasan E; Chusid J; Paul S; Inra M; Makhnevich A; Raoof S; Silvestri G; Bade BC; Cohen SL
    Int J Med Inform; 2024 Nov; 191():105580. PubMed ID: 39096594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Deep Learning-Based Decision Support Tool for Precision Risk Assessment of Breast Cancer.
    He T; Puppala M; Ezeana CF; Huang YS; Chou PH; Yu X; Chen S; Wang L; Yin Z; Danforth RL; Ensor J; Chang J; Patel T; Wong STC
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 May; 3():1-12. PubMed ID: 31141423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increasing the Efficiency on Producing Radiology Reports for Breast Cancer Diagnosis by Means of Structured Reports. A Comparative Study.
    Segrelles JD; Medina R; Blanquer I; Martí-Bonmatí L
    Methods Inf Med; 2017 May; 56(3):248-260. PubMed ID: 28220929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.