These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27388877)
21. Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience. Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Fine JP; Shachter RD; Sisney GA; Leung WK Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 16926323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry. Lacson R; Harris K; Brawarsky P; Tosteson TD; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Kaye A; Gonzalez I; Birdwell R; Haas JS J Digit Imaging; 2015 Oct; 28(5):567-75. PubMed ID: 25561069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Current Status and Future of BI-RADS in Multimodality Imaging, From the Eghtedari M; Chong A; Rakow-Penner R; Ojeda-Fournier H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):860-873. PubMed ID: 33295802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automatic classification of mammography reports by BI-RADS breast tissue composition class. Percha B; Nassif H; Lipson J; Burnside E; Rubin D J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(5):913-6. PubMed ID: 22291166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A probabilistic expert system that provides automated mammographic-histologic correlation: initial experience. Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Shachter RD; Sohlich RE; Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Feb; 182(2):481-8. PubMed ID: 14736686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Use of the American College of Radiology BI-RADS guidelines by community radiologists: concordance of assessments and recommendations assigned to screening mammograms. Lehman C; Holt S; Peacock S; White E; Urban N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12076896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Extraction of BI-RADS findings from breast ultrasound reports in Chinese using deep learning approaches. Miao S; Xu T; Wu Y; Xie H; Wang J; Jing S; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Yang Y; Zhang X; Shan T; Wang L; Xu H; Wang S; Liu Y Int J Med Inform; 2018 Nov; 119():17-21. PubMed ID: 30342682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. External validation of a publicly available computer assisted diagnostic tool for mammographic mass lesions with two high prevalence research datasets. Benndorf M; Burnside ES; Herda C; Langer M; Kotter E Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4987-96. PubMed ID: 26233224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound. Chae EY; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Choi WJ; Kim HH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Mar; 206(3):666-72. PubMed ID: 26901026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Probabilistic Model to Support Radiologists' Classification Decisions in Mammography Practice. Zeng J; Gimenez F; Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Shachter R Med Decis Making; 2019 Apr; 39(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30819048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population. Zonderland HM; Pope TL; Nieborg AJ Eur Radiol; 2004 Oct; 14(10):1743-50. PubMed ID: 15243715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ACR BI-RADS Assessment Category 4 Subdivisions in Diagnostic Mammography: Utilization and Outcomes in the National Mammography Database. Elezaby M; Li G; Bhargavan-Chatfield M; Burnside ES; DeMartini WB Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):416-422. PubMed ID: 29315061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]