208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27388931)
21. Evaluation of the robotic approach concerning pitfalls in rectal surgery.
Baukloh JK; Reeh M; Spinoglio G; Corratti A; Bartolini I; Mirasolo VM; Priora F; Izbicki JR; Gomez Fleitas M; Gomez Ruiz M; Perez DR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 28189455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery with the double stapling technique for stage 0/I rectal carcinoma: a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial.
Tanaka K; Okuda J; Yamamoto S; Ito M; Sakamoto K; Kokuba Y; Yoshimura K; Watanabe M
Surg Today; 2017 Oct; 47(10):1215-1222. PubMed ID: 28280982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Does prolonged operative time impact postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing robotic-assisted rectal resection for cancer?
Duchalais E; Machairas N; Kelley SR; Landmann RG; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT; Mathis KL; Dozois EJ; Larson DW
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3659-3666. PubMed ID: 29546672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system on conversion to laparotomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in Japan (a secondary analysis of the EnSSURE study).
Goto K; Watanabe J; Nagasaki T; Uemura M; Ozawa H; Kurose Y; Akagi T; Ichikawa N; Iijima H; Inomata M; Taketomi A; Naitoh T;
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2454-2464. PubMed ID: 38459211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy.
Targarona EM; Balague C; Pernas JC; Martinez C; Berindoague R; Gich I; Trias M
Ann Surg; 2008 Apr; 247(4):642-9. PubMed ID: 18362627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery.
Crippa J; Grass F; Achilli P; Mathis KL; Kelley SR; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT; Larson DW
Br J Surg; 2020 Apr; 107(5):560-566. PubMed ID: 31976558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Conversions in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
van der Pas MHGM; Deijen CL; Abis GSA; de Lange-de Klerk ESM; Haglind E; Fürst A; Lacy AM; Cuesta MA; Bonjer HJ;
Surg Endosc; 2017 May; 31(5):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 27766413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Male sex and history of ischemic heart disease are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer.
Shinji S; Ueda Y; Yamada T; Koizumi M; Yokoyama Y; Takahashi G; Hotta M; Iwai T; Hara K; Takeda K; Okusa M; Kan H; Uchida E; Yoshida H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 30016941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Nomogram to predict anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.
Yao HH; Shao F; Huang Q; Wu Y; Qiang Zhu Z; Liang W
Hepatogastroenterology; 2014; 61(133):1257-61. PubMed ID: 25436293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of Early and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Converted Laparoscopic Resection Compared to Primary Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
Allaix ME; Furnée E; Esposito L; Mistrangelo M; Rebecchi F; Arezzo A; Morino M
World J Surg; 2018 Oct; 42(10):3405-3414. PubMed ID: 29610930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design.
Lelong B; de Chaisemartin C; Meillat H; Cournier S; Boher JM; Genre D; Karoui M; Tuech JJ; Delpero JR;
BMC Cancer; 2017 Apr; 17(1):253. PubMed ID: 28399840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcome following laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Penninckx F; Kartheuser A; Van de Stadt J; Pattyn P; Mansvelt B; Bertrand C; Van Eycken E; Jegou D; Fieuws S;
Br J Surg; 2013 Sep; 100(10):1368-75. PubMed ID: 23939849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review.
Iwamoto M; Kawada K; Hida K; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 15(1):143. PubMed ID: 28764707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.
Laurent C; Leblanc F; Wütrich P; Scheffler M; Rullier E
Ann Surg; 2009 Jul; 250(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 19561481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer.
Akiyoshi T; Ueno M; Fukunaga Y; Nagayama S; Fujimoto Y; Konishi T; Kuroyanagi H; Yamaguchi T
Am J Surg; 2011 Sep; 202(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 21871980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Case-matched study of short-term effects of 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.
Zeng Q; Lei F; Gao Z; Wang Y; Gao QK
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 15(1):178. PubMed ID: 28938898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of obesity on operation performed, complications, and long-term outcomes in terms of restoration of intestinal continuity for patients with mid and low rectal cancer.
Aytac E; Lavery IC; Kalady MF; Kiran RP
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):689-97. PubMed ID: 23652741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Risk Factors for Conversion and Morbidity During Initial Experience in Laparoscopic Proctectomies: a Retrospective Study.
Hrora A; Majbar AM; Elalaoui M; Raiss M; Sabbah F; Ahallat M
Indian J Surg; 2017 Apr; 79(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 28442832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
