These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2738948)
21. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Tumor location and detectability in mammographic screening. Schmitt EL; Threatt B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Oct; 139(4):761-5. PubMed ID: 6981939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The false-negative mammogram. Huynh PT; Jarolimek AM; Daye S Radiographics; 1998; 18(5):1137-54; quiz 1243-4. PubMed ID: 9747612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer. Endo T Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1996 Mar; 23 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 8702316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film-screen combinations. Meeson S; Young KC; Rust A; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Ramsdale ML Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):825-35. PubMed ID: 11560831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening. Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Additional images and subsequent palpation--indispensable conditions for efficient diagnosis using mammography]. Hüppe JR Z Lymphol; 1986 Dec; 10(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 3825243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effective breast cancer detection with film-screen mammography. Schmitt EL; Threatt BA J Can Assoc Radiol; 1985 Dec; 36(4):304-7. PubMed ID: 4086500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Baseline screening mammography with one versus two views. Anttinen I; Pamilo M; Roiha M; Soiva M; Suramo I Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):241-3. PubMed ID: 2591390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Magnification mammography using 0.1 mm microfocus. Comparison of grid and spot-view magnification]. Teubner J; Lenk JZ; Wentz KU; Georgi M Radiologe; 1987 Apr; 27(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 3037589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Clinical trial of mammography with film-screen-combinations. Part 1: Selection of a suitable film-screen system]. Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F Rontgenpraxis; 1981; 34(11):458-66. PubMed ID: 7313855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population. Schmitt EL; Threatt B AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. Sickles EA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Apr; 146(4):661-3. PubMed ID: 3485337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Breast cancers in women 35 years of age and younger: mammographic findings. Shaw de Paredes E; Marsteller LP; Eden BV Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 2399309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Usefulness of the routine magnification view after breast conservation therapy for carcinoma. DiPiro PJ; Meyer JE; Shaffer K; Denison CM; Frenna TH; Rolfs AT Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):341-3. PubMed ID: 8596828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. Harvey JA; Fajardo LL; Innis CA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8249720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Oblique-view mammography: adequacy for screening. Work in progress. Muir BB; Kirkpatrick AE; Roberts MM; Duffy SW Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 6701330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Film-screen combinations in mammography]. Friedrich M Z Lymphol; 1983 Dec; 7(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 6673399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]