231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27389655)
1. Mammographic density is the main correlate of tumors detected on ultrasound but not on mammography.
Häberle L; Fasching PA; Brehm B; Heusinger K; Jud SM; Loehberg CR; Hack CC; Preuss C; Lux MP; Hartmann A; Vachon CM; Meier-Meitinger M; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R
Int J Cancer; 2016 Nov; 139(9):1967-74. PubMed ID: 27389655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using automated texture features to determine the probability for masking of a tumor on mammography, but not ultrasound.
Häberle L; Hack CC; Heusinger K; Wagner F; Jud SM; Uder M; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wittenberg T; Fasching PA
Eur J Med Res; 2017 Aug; 22(1):30. PubMed ID: 28854966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Addition of Automated Breast Ultrasound to Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening Decreases Stage at Diagnosis.
Grady I; Chanisheva N; Vasquez T
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1570-1574. PubMed ID: 28760362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of BSGI, MRI, mammography, and ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast lesions and their correlations with specific molecular subtypes in Chinese women.
Liu H; Zhan H; Sun D; Zhang Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Aug; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 32799808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography alone for breast cancer screening in asymptomatic women.
Boonlikit S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(12):7731-6. PubMed ID: 24460360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of Diagnostic Mammography as the Primary Imaging Modality for Palpable Lumps in Women With Almost Entirely Fatty Breasts.
Linden OE; Hayward JH; Price ER; Kelil T; Joe BN; Lee AY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):938-944. PubMed ID: 32023120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tumor characteristics and family history in relation to mammographic density and breast cancer: The French E3N cohort.
Maskarinec G; Dartois L; Delaloge S; Hopper J; Clavel-Chapelon F; Baglietto L
Cancer Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 49():156-160. PubMed ID: 28697417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between mammographic density and pregnancies relative to age and BMI: a breast cancer case-only analysis.
Hack CC; Emons J; Jud SM; Heusinger K; Adler W; Gass P; Haeberle L; Heindl F; Hein A; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Hartmann A; Beckmann MW; Fasching PA; Pöhls UG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):701-708. PubMed ID: 28828694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adding Ultrasound to the Evaluation of Patients with Pathologic Nipple Discharge to Diagnose Additional Breast Cancers: Preliminary Data.
Yoon H; Yoon JH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park BW; Kim MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):2099-107. PubMed ID: 25952162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.
Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F
Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic and ultrasound features of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.
Porter AJ; Evans EB; Foxcroft LM; Simpson PT; Lakhani SR
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Feb; 58(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 24529050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women.
Venturini E; Losio C; Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; Fedele I; Tacchini S; Schiani E; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Panzeri MM; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A
Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 23579052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practicing breast imaging in HRT ladies in Thailand.
Bhothisuwan W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Oct; 87 Suppl 3():S169-73. PubMed ID: 21213518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Focal Breast Pain: Does Breast Density Affect the Need for Ultrasound?
Cho MW; Grimm LJ; Johnson KS
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27746121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic and sonographic evaluation.
Albayrak ZK; Onay HK; Karatağ GY; Karatağ O
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2011 Sep; 17(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 20706979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients.
Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
