These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27390267)

  • 1. Bayesian network meta-analysis for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Uhlmann L; Jensen K; Kieser M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):236-250. PubMed ID: 27390267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of cluster randomization trials.
    Donner A; Piaggio G; Villar J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2001 Oct; 10(5):325-38. PubMed ID: 11697225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Meta-analyses involving cluster randomization trials: a review of published literature in health care.
    Laopaiboon M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2003 Dec; 12(6):515-30. PubMed ID: 14653354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-cluster correlation selection for cluster randomized trials.
    Westgate PM
    Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(19):3272-84. PubMed ID: 26924419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology.
    Efthimiou O; Debray TP; van Valkenhoef G; Trelle S; Panayidou K; Moons KG; Reitsma JB; Shang A; Salanti G;
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Sep; 7(3):236-63. PubMed ID: 26754852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A tutorial on Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of mixed binary-continuous outcomes with missing treatment effects.
    Gajic-Veljanoski O; Cheung AM; Bayoumi AM; Tomlinson G
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2092-108. PubMed ID: 26553369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simultaneous Comparison of Efficacy and Adverse Events of Interventions for Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.
    Doosti-Irani A; Mansournia MA; Rahimi-Foroushani A; Cheraghi Z; Holakouie-Naieni K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(2):867-72. PubMed ID: 26925694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: the Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT).
    Ma J; Thabane L; Kaczorowski J; Chambers L; Dolovich L; Karwalajtys T; Levitt C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Jun; 9():37. PubMed ID: 19531226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical approaches to adjusting weights for dependent arms in network meta-analysis.
    Su YX; Tu YK
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):431-440. PubMed ID: 29786957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of adaptive platform trials using a network approach.
    Marschner IC; Schou IM
    Clin Trials; 2022 Oct; 19(5):479-489. PubMed ID: 35993542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining randomized and non-randomized evidence in network meta-analysis.
    Efthimiou O; Mavridis D; Debray TP; Samara M; Belger M; Siontis GC; Leucht S; Salanti G;
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1210-1226. PubMed ID: 28083901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian methods for analysis of binary outcome data in cluster randomized trials on the absolute risk scale.
    Thompson SG; Warn DE; Turner RM
    Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):389-410. PubMed ID: 14748035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian methods of analysis for cluster randomized trials with binary outcome data.
    Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(3):453-72. PubMed ID: 11180313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2.
    Hoaglin DC; Hawkins N; Jansen JP; Scott DA; Itzler R; Cappelleri JC; Boersma C; Thompson D; Larholt KM; Diaz M; Barrett A
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):429-37. PubMed ID: 21669367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses in cluster-randomized trials.
    Moerbeek M
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Feb; 51(1):126-137. PubMed ID: 30350025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis of community-based cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):491-8. PubMed ID: 17942465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: how to do it.
    Greco T; Landoni G; Biondi-Zoccai G; D'Ascenzo F; Zangrillo A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1757-1773. PubMed ID: 23970014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constructing intervals for the intracluster correlation coefficient using Bayesian modelling, and application in cluster randomized trials.
    Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1443-56. PubMed ID: 16220510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.