These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

534 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27390333)

  • 21. Hemodynamic impact of coronary stenosis using computed tomography: comparison between noninvasive fractional flow reserve and 3D fusion of coronary angiography with stress myocardial perfusion.
    Patel AR; Maffessanti F; Patel MB; Kebed K; Narang A; Singh A; Medvedofsky D; Zaidi SJ; Mediratta A; Goyal N; Kachenoura N; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1733-1743. PubMed ID: 31073698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incremental Value of Subtended Myocardial Mass for Identifying FFR-Verified Ischemia Using Quantitative CT Angiography: Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and CT-FFR.
    Yang DH; Kang SJ; Koo HJ; Kweon J; Kang JW; Lim TH; Jung J; Kim N; Lee JG; Han S; Ahn JM; Park DW; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Mintz GS; Kim YH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 12(4):707-717. PubMed ID: 29361491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lesion-Specific and Vessel-Related Determinants of Fractional Flow Reserve Beyond Coronary Artery Stenosis.
    Ahmadi A; Leipsic J; Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Bagiella E; Ko B; Dey D; LaRocca G; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S; De Bruyne B; Nørgaard BL; Narula J
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 11(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 29311033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.
    Douglas PS; Pontone G; Hlatky MA; Patel MR; Norgaard BL; Byrne RA; Curzen N; Purcell I; Gutberlet M; Rioufol G; Hink U; Schuchlenz HW; Feuchtner G; Gilard M; Andreini D; Jensen JM; Hadamitzky M; Chiswell K; Cyr D; Wilk A; Wang F; Rogers C; De Bruyne B;
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Dec; 36(47):3359-67. PubMed ID: 26330417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging vs Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Diagnosis of Invasive Vessel-Specific Coronary Physiology: Predictive Modeling Results From the Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Determinants of Myocardial Ischemia (CREDENCE) Trial.
    Stuijfzand WJ; van Rosendael AR; Lin FY; Chang HJ; van den Hoogen IJ; Gianni U; Choi JH; Doh JH; Her AY; Koo BK; Nam CW; Park HB; Shin SH; Cole J; Gimelli A; Khan MA; Lu B; Gao Y; Nabi F; Nakazato R; Schoepf UJ; Driessen RS; Bom MJ; Thompson R; Jang JJ; Ridner M; Rowan C; Avelar E; Généreux P; Knaapen P; de Waard GA; Pontone G; Andreini D; Al-Mallah MH; Lu Y; Berman DS; Narula J; Min JK; Bax JJ; Shaw LJ;
    JAMA Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 5(12):1338-1348. PubMed ID: 32822476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Noninvasive CT-Derived FFR Based on Structural and Fluid Analysis: A Comparison With Invasive FFR for Detection of Functionally Significant Stenosis.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Munnur RK; Wong DTL; Fujisawa Y; Sakaguchi T; Hirohata K; Hislop-Jambrich J; Fujimoto S; Takamura K; Crossett M; Leung M; Kuganesan A; Malaiapan Y; Nasis A; Troupis J; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 10(6):663-673. PubMed ID: 27771399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
    Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Caruso D; Baumann S; Renker M; Mangold S; Dyer KT; Varga-Szemes A; Baquet M; Jochheim D; Ebersberger U; Bayer RR; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26993434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms for intermediate stenoses confirmed by quantitative coronary angiography.
    Min JK; Koo BK; Erglis A; Doh JH; Daniels DV; Jegere S; Kim HS; Dunning AM; Defrance T; Lansky A; Leipsic J
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 110(7):971-6. PubMed ID: 22749390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dynamic Myocardial Perfusion CT for the Detection of Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
    Nous FMA; Geisler T; Kruk MBP; Alkadhi H; Kitagawa K; Vliegenthart R; Hell MM; Hausleiter J; Nguyen PK; Budde RPJ; Nikolaou K; Kepka C; Manka R; Sakuma H; Malik SB; Coenen A; Zijlstra F; Klotz E; van der Harst P; Artzner C; Dedic A; Pugliese F; Bamberg F; Nieman K
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Jan; 15(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 34538630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR?
    Solecki M; Kruk M; Demkow M; Schoepf UJ; Reynolds MA; Wardziak Ł; Dzielińska Z; Śpiewak M; Miłosz-Wieczorek B; Małek Ł; Marczak M; Kępka C
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 28844869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: Methodology and evaluation of a point of care algorithm.
    Coenen A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono A; Dedic A; Chelu RG; Dijkshoorn ML; van Geuns RJ; Schoebinger M; Itu L; Sharma P; Nieman K
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 26747231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Diagnostic performance of on-site computed CT-fractional flow reserve based on fluid structure interactions: comparison with invasive fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio.
    Fujimoto S; Kawasaki T; Kumamaru KK; Kawaguchi Y; Dohi T; Okonogi T; Ri K; Yamada S; Takamura K; Kato E; Kato Y; Hiki M; Okazaki S; Aoki S; Mitsouras D; Rybicki FJ; Daida H
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 20(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 30107511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Integrating CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR in the Work-Up of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Coenen A; Rossi A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono AK; Chelu RG; Segreto S; Dijkshoorn ML; Wragg A; van Geuns RM; Pugliese F; Nieman K
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 10(7):760-770. PubMed ID: 28109933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Machine Learning Algorithm versus Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling.
    Tesche C; De Cecco CN; Baumann S; Renker M; McLaurin TW; Duguay TM; Bayer RR; Steinberg DH; Grant KL; Canstein C; Schwemmer C; Schoebinger M; Itu LM; Rapaka S; Sharma P; Schoepf UJ
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 29634438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based computed fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of myocardial ischemia verified by invasive FFR.
    Hu X; Yang M; Han L; Du Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1987-1996. PubMed ID: 30062537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic value of quantitative stenosis predictors with coronary CT angiography compared to invasive fractional flow reserve.
    Wang R; Renker M; Schoepf UJ; Wichmann JL; Fuller SR; Rier JD; Bayer RR; Steinberg DH; De Cecco CN; Baumann S
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 84(8):1509-1515. PubMed ID: 26022519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. CT morphological index provides incremental value to machine learning based CT-FFR for predicting hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
    Yu M; Lu Z; Li W; Wei M; Yan J; Zhang J
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 265():256-261. PubMed ID: 29885695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.